More pilog adventures!
Alex, would it be possible to give pilog an and/2 rule similar to the or/2 rule
that pilog has now? Sometimes refactoring pilog around the lack of an and/2 is
a pain. Here's an example, where a rule has a kind of a logical expression
(with prolog backup):
What is select ( http://software-lab.de/doc/refS.html#select/3 ) using
internally for the filter part?
Seems to me the filter part is a kind of implicit and.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Doug Snead semaphore_2...@yahoo.com wrote:
More pilog adventures!
Alex, would it be possible to give
Hi Henrik,
What is select ( http://software-lab.de/doc/refS.html#select/3 ) using
internally for the filter part?
Seems to me the filter part is a kind of implicit and.
Right.
As I wrote in the previous mails, all clauses in a Prolog rule (not only
in 'select/3') are combined by an implict
Hi Doug,
Alex, would it be possible to give pilog an and/2 rule similar to the
or/2 rule that pilog has now? Sometimes refactoring pilog around the
lack of an and/2 is a pain. Here's an example, where a rule has a kind
of a logical expression (with prolog backup):
As I wrote in my last mail,
a...@software-lab.de
Subject: Re: and/2 another pilog question
To: picolisp@software-lab.de
Date: Wednesday, June 29, 2011, 9:12 PM
Hi Henrik,
What is select ( http://software-lab.de/doc/refS.html#select/3 ) using
internally for the filter part?
Seems to me the filter part is a kind
