[Piglit] [PATCH v3] arb_program_interface_query: GetProgramResourceIndex test

Test passes on Nvidia GTX 660 (binary driver version 331.38). v2: separate atomic counter index subtest (Ilia Mirkin) + code and shader cleanups + added subroutine index query test v3: fix indentation (argh!) Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli --- tests/all.py

[Piglit] [PATCH v2] arb_program_interface_query: GetProgramResourceIndex test

Test passes on Nvidia GTX 660 (binary driver version 331.38). v2: separate atomic counter index subtest (Ilia Mirkin) + code and shader cleanups + added subroutine index query test Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli --- tests/all.py | 1 + .../arb_progra

[Piglit] [PATCH v2 1/2] shaders: add test to check (0 cmp x+y) optimization

Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez --- v2: * Implement it as shader_runner test tests/shaders/glsl-opt-0-cmp-xy.shader_test | 33 + 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/shaders/glsl-opt-0-cmp-xy.shader_test diff --git a/tests/shaders/glsl

[Piglit] [PATCH v2 2/2] shaders: add test to check (x+y cmp 0) optimization

Signed-off-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez --- v2: * Implement it as shader_runner test tests/shaders/glsl-opt-xy-cmp-0.shader_test | 33 + 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/shaders/glsl-opt-xy-cmp-0.shader_test diff --git a/tests/shaders/glsl

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] shaders: add test to check (0 cmp x+y) optimization

On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 08:16 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > Why were these implemented as C tests instead of shader-runner tests? > Oh, you are right. They should be shader-runner tests. Please ignore these patches, I will send a new version of them but implemented as shader-runner tests instead. T

[Piglit] [Bug 89329] glsl-deriv-varyings regression

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89329 --- Comment #3 from lu hua --- I also see this fail on all platforms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Piglit mailing l

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] arb_program_interface_query: GetProgramResourceIndex test

On 02/27/2015 06:36 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote: diff --git a/tests/all.py b/tests/all.py index 8b9426a..d19b20a 100644 --- a/tests/all.py +++ b/tests/all.py @@ -2049,6 +2049,7 @@ for test_type in ('shader', 'api'): arb_program_interface_query

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] arb_program_interface_query: GetProgramResourceIndex test

On 02/27/2015 06:04 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote: Test passes on Nvidia GTX 660 (binary driver version 331.38). Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli --- tests/all.py | 1 + .../arb_program_interface_query/CMakeL

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] amd_compressed_atc_texture: add miptree test

And naturally I forgot to add the new test to all.py, I've added this hunk locally: --- a/tests/all.py +++ b/tests/all.py @@ -3901,6 +3901,9 @@ oes_compressed_paletted_texture['basic API'] = PiglitGLTest(['oes_compressed_pal oes_compressed_paletted_texture['invalid formats'] = PiglitGLTest(['arb_

[Piglit] [PATCH] amd_compressed_atc_texture: add miptree test

This echoes the ETC1 miptree test, and even uses the same image. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin --- I used The Compressonator tool from AMD, which generates DDS files, so I also added *very* basic support for DDS files in piglit. It could be extended by an interested party to actually support more f

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] AMD_performance_monitor: add missing subtest result

On 03/01/2015 07:16 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: On Saturday, February 28, 2015 06:20:15 PM Samuel Pitoiset wrote: The "counters in range" subtest was not reported. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset --- tests/spec/amd_performance_monitor/measure.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff -