From: Roland Scheidegger
The rect halves comparison is in fact not valid in general. The reason is that
the same geometry does not have the same precision even if it it just shifted
by some fixed amount in one direction.
As an example, some calculated x value near 7 will be near 263 if drawn with
Oops just forget the changes on the quad-invariance test (this is just
what I used to prove the same issue on "real" hw).
Am 09.01.2016 um 02:12 schrieb srol...@vmware.com:
> From: Roland Scheidegger
>
> The rect halves comparison is in fact not valid in general. The reason is that
> the same ge
On 01/08/2016 05:12 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
> From: Roland Scheidegger
>
> The rect halves comparison is in fact not valid in general. The reason is that
> the same geometry does not have the same precision even if it it just shifted
> by some fixed amount in one direction.
> As an example,
Am 09.01.2016 um 04:09 schrieb Ian Romanick:
> On 01/08/2016 05:12 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> The rect halves comparison is in fact not valid in general. The reason is
>> that
>> the same geometry does not have the same precision even if it it just shifted
>>
From: Roland Scheidegger
The rect halves comparison is in fact not valid in general. The reason is that
the same geometry does not have the same precision even if it it just shifted
by some fixed amount in one direction.
As an example, some calculated x value near 7 will be near 263 if drawn with