Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] fbo: add a test for blending with float special values

2017-11-05 Thread Brian Paul
On 11/04/2017 02:44 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: See what happens when doing 0 * Inf and NaN. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin --- Not sure if this is worth checking in. I was just wondering what various hardware did, and this covers many of the permutations. This test can be run both in core profile, or

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] fbo: add a test for blending with float special values

2017-11-05 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Brian Paul wrote: > On 11/04/2017 02:44 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> >> See what happens when doing 0 * Inf and NaN. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin >> --- >> >> Not sure if this is worth checking in. I was just wondering what various >> hardware did, and this cover

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] fbo: add a test for blending with float special values

2017-11-05 Thread Brian Paul
On 11/05/2017 10:46 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Brian Paul wrote: On 11/04/2017 02:44 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: See what happens when doing 0 * Inf and NaN. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin --- Not sure if this is worth checking in. I was just wondering what various hard

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH v2] shaders: Test using a bound program after an unsuccessful relink

2017-11-05 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 03/11/17 21:27, Neil Roberts wrote: Timothy Arceri writes: Thanks for the test! The idea is great, the only problem I see is that the minimum GL version seems too high. This test would not run on the i915 driver which is a problem IMO. Can you lower the requirements? Good point. Here is