Re: [Piglit] [PATCH crucible] Add test for bug 108911

2018-12-04 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
On 04/12/2018 19:13, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: +if (resolvedData[1][i] != 0xff00ff00) { +printf("unexpected clear color in layer1: got 0x%x expected 0x00ff00ff\n", + resolvedData[1][i]); +t_fail(); +return; Duh! fixed that error mess

[Piglit] [PATCH crucible] Add test for bug 108911

2018-12-04 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin --- Makefile.am| 1 + src/tests/bug/108911.c | 306 + 2 files changed, 307 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/tests/bug/108911.c diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 528650a..6e99516 100644 --- a/Ma

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH crucible] Add a test for bug 108909

2018-12-04 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
On 04/12/2018 14:52, Józef Kucia wrote: On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:46 PM Lionel Landwerlin wrote: Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin --- Makefile.am| 1 + src/tests/bug/108909.c | 106 + 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+) create mode 1006

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH crucible] Add a test for bug 108909

2018-12-04 Thread Józef Kucia
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:46 PM Lionel Landwerlin wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin > --- > Makefile.am| 1 + > src/tests/bug/108909.c | 106 + > 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 src/tests/bug/108909.c > > dif

[Piglit] [PATCH crucible] Add a test for bug 108909

2018-12-04 Thread Lionel Landwerlin
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin --- Makefile.am| 1 + src/tests/bug/108909.c | 106 + 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/tests/bug/108909.c diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index b35e329..528650a 100644 --- a/Ma

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import: drop alpha-one to sample yuv tests

2018-12-04 Thread Tapani Pälli
Reviewed-by: Tapani Pälli On 11/13/18 4:40 PM, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: This option only applies to the sample_rgb tests. Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin --- tests/opengl.py | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/opengl.py b/tests/opengl.py index c

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH v2] miptree: test ability to use upside down miptree

2018-12-04 Thread andrey simiklit
Hello, Didn't know it, thanks for clarification :) Regards, Andrii. On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:01 PM Mark Janes wrote: > It's preferable to push piglit tests first, and produce the CI test > failure. CI staff will track the failure, and attribute it to the > piglit patch. When the subsequent