Old files have duplicated entries for each subtest, in addition to a
filled subtest dictionary. Detect that the current test name is also a
subtest and treat it as though it were a complete test. This may have
false-negatives, but they're unlikely given test/subtest naming
convention.
Signed-off-b
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Dylan, I'm sure you hate this, but it does seem to work for me. Not sure where
> you are with your fix, but this is a tool that lots of people use, so it does
> need to be addressed.
Does it?
What's the purpose of comparing results from diffe
On 29.05.2014 13:09, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Dylan, I'm sure you hate this, but it does seem to work for me. Not sure
>> where
>> you are with your fix, but this is a tool that lots of people use, so it does
>> need to be addressed.
>
> Does it
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 13:15:54 Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 29.05.2014 13:09, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin
wrote:
> >> Dylan, I'm sure you hate this, but it does seem to work for me. Not
sure
> >> where you are with your fix, but this is a tool that lots of
On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 22:17:55 Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Old files have duplicated entries for each subtest, in addition to a
> filled subtest dictionary. Detect that the current test name is also a
> subtest and treat it as though it were a complete test. This may have
> false-negatives, but they'
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 29.05.2014 13:09, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Dylan, I'm sure you hate this, but it does seem to work for me. Not sure
>>> where
>>> you are with your fix, but this is a tool that lots of
On 29.05.2014 13:18, Dylan Baker wrote:
> On Thursday, May 29, 2014 13:15:54 Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 29.05.2014 13:09, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin
> wrote:
Dylan, I'm sure you hate this, but it does seem to work for me. Not
> sure
where you ar
On 29.05.2014 13:22, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 29.05.2014 13:09, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Dylan, I'm sure you hate this, but it does seem to work for me. Not sure
where
you are
On 05/28/2014 07:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Old files have duplicated entries for each subtest, in addition to a
> filled subtest dictionary. Detect that the current test name is also a
> subtest and treat it as though it were a complete test. This may have
> false-negatives, but they're unlikely
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 05/28/2014 07:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> Old files have duplicated entries for each subtest, in addition to a
>> filled subtest dictionary. Detect that the current test name is also a
>> subtest and treat it as though it were a comple
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Kenneth Graunke
> wrote:
>> On 05/28/2014 07:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> Old files have duplicated entries for each subtest, in addition to a
>>> filled subtest dictionary. Detect that the current test name
First, I'm sorry for complaining and not reviewing patches, because I
don't know Python very well and I'm also quite busy. I'm grateful for
all the work on piglit that's happening.
I always keep old piglit results from old Mesa around, that includes
R580, RV670, RV730, EG/Redwood, NI/Cayman, SI/Ve
On 29.05.2014 22:23, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Kenneth Graunke
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/28/2014 07:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Old files have duplicated entries for each subtest, in addition to a
filled subtes
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 09:23:17 AM Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Kenneth Graunke
wrote:
> >> On 05/28/2014 07:17 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >>> Old files have duplicated entries for each subtest, in addition to a
>
14 matches
Mail list logo