Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 09/10] arb_enhanced_layouts: add another xfb_stride overflow test

2019-02-02 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 3/2/19 7:30 am, Andres Gomez wrote: On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 10:15 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote: On 2/2/19 4:55 am, Andres Gomez wrote: Additional check to address a bug in mesa in which a stride which is a divisor of the declared offset for an overflowing varying won't fail. From the GL_ARB_

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 09/10] arb_enhanced_layouts: add another xfb_stride overflow test

2019-02-02 Thread Andres Gomez
On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 10:15 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote: > On 2/2/19 4:55 am, Andres Gomez wrote: > > Additional check to address a bug in mesa in which a stride which > > is a divisor of the declared offset for an overflowing varying > > won't fail. > > > > From the GL_ARB_enhanced_layouts spec:

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 09/10] arb_enhanced_layouts: add another xfb_stride overflow test

2019-02-01 Thread Timothy Arceri
On 2/2/19 4:55 am, Andres Gomez wrote: Additional check to address a bug in mesa in which a stride which is a divisor of the declared offset for an overflowing varying won't fail. From the GL_ARB_enhanced_layouts spec: " It is a compile-time or link-time error to have any *xfb_offset*

[Piglit] [PATCH 09/10] arb_enhanced_layouts: add another xfb_stride overflow test

2019-02-01 Thread Andres Gomez
Additional check to address a bug in mesa in which a stride which is a divisor of the declared offset for an overflowing varying won't fail. From the GL_ARB_enhanced_layouts spec: " It is a compile-time or link-time error to have any *xfb_offset* that overflows *xfb_stride*, whether stated