On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 16:02 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 3:56:09 PM PDT Mark Janes wrote:
> >
> > Kenneth Graunke writes:
> >
> > >
> > > The new ARB_vertex_attrib_64bit tests specify integer uniform
> > > values
> > > as hex, such as 0xc21620c5. As an integer value,
On lun, 2016-06-06 at 16:02 -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Monday, June 6, 2016 3:56:09 PM PDT Mark Janes wrote:
> >
> > Kenneth Graunke writes:
> >
> > >
> > > The new ARB_vertex_attrib_64bit tests specify integer uniform
> > > values
> > > as hex, such as 0xc21620c5. As an integer value,
On Monday, June 6, 2016 3:56:09 PM PDT Mark Janes wrote:
> Kenneth Graunke writes:
>
> > The new ARB_vertex_attrib_64bit tests specify integer uniform values
> > as hex, such as 0xc21620c5. As an integer value, this is beyond LONG_MAX
> > on 32-bit systems. The intent is to parse it as an unsig
Kenneth Graunke writes:
> The new ARB_vertex_attrib_64bit tests specify integer uniform values
> as hex, such as 0xc21620c5. As an integer value, this is beyond LONG_MAX
> on 32-bit systems. The intent is to parse it as an unsigned hex value and
> bitcast it.
>
> However, we still need to handl
The new ARB_vertex_attrib_64bit tests specify integer uniform values
as hex, such as 0xc21620c5. As an integer value, this is beyond LONG_MAX
on 32-bit systems. The intent is to parse it as an unsigned hex value and
bitcast it.
However, we still need to handle parsing values with negative signs.
