On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 06:11:00PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
This required some ugly hacking about to get the list of subtests to
process_args. Suggestions?
The utility is that all.tests can do 'sometest -list-subtests' to
automatically get
On 10/04/2013 06:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
This required some ugly hacking about to get the list of subtests to
process_args. Suggestions?
Let's avoid these ugly hacks. Here's my suggestion, which covers patches 2 and
3.
Patch 2/4 moves `struct
On 10/07/2013 11:02 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
On 10/04/2013 06:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
This required some ugly hacking about to get the list of subtests to
process_args. Suggestions?
Let's avoid these ugly hacks. Here's my suggestion, which
On 10/07/2013 04:19 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 10/07/2013 11:02 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
On 10/04/2013 06:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
This required some ugly hacking about to get the list of subtests to
process_args. Suggestions?
Let's avoid these
From: Ian Romanick ian.d.roman...@intel.com
This required some ugly hacking about to get the list of subtests to
process_args. Suggestions?
The utility is that all.tests can do 'sometest -list-subtests' to
automatically get the list of subtests to run. Since the syntax for
selecting subtests
