On 7 January 2013 14:21, Chris Forbes wrote:
> This test actually gets *simpler*, generalized to arbitrary sample
> counts. I'll cook something up tonight.
>
Ok, cool. While you're looking into that, there are several other ways I
think this test needs to be generalized:
- We need to test a pi
This test actually gets *simpler*, generalized to arbitrary sample
counts. I'll cook something up tonight.
-- Chris
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Paul Berry wrote:
> On 5 January 2013 01:07, Chris Forbes wrote:
>>
>> Writes a test pattern to individual samples in a multisample texture,
>> an
On 5 January 2013 01:07, Chris Forbes wrote:
> Writes a test pattern to individual samples in a multisample texture,
> and tests texelFetch() reads the correct values for each sample.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
>
Unforunately, I think we need to generalize this test to test a variety of
sa
Writes a test pattern to individual samples in a multisample texture,
and tests texelFetch() reads the correct values for each sample.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
---
tests/all.tests| 2 +
.../spec/arb_texture_multisample/CMakeLists.gl.txt | 1 +
.../texel
