I'm gonna push these tomorrow unless someone objects.
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 05:55:47 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> For a long time piglit has had a considerable problem with resuming
> interrupted runs. This problem comes from the recovery tool, a very
> fragile piece of code that relies on the
I'm getting a little antsy to land this. It's a pretty invasive series
and I'd like to land it sooner rather than later to save myself rebasing
pains.
On Friday, September 26, 2014 09:28:17 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> bump.
>
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 05:55:47 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> > For a l
bump.
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 05:55:47 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> For a long time piglit has had a considerable problem with resuming
> interrupted runs. This problem comes from the recovery tool, a very
> fragile piece of code that relies on the formatting of the json to walk
> backwards thro
I always forget,
This is available at my github:
https://github.com/dcbaker/piglit.git submit/atomic-writes
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 05:55:47 PM Dylan Baker wrote:
> For a long time piglit has had a considerable problem with resuming
> interrupted runs. This problem comes from the recovery
For a long time piglit has had a considerable problem with resuming
interrupted runs. This problem comes from the recovery tool, a very
fragile piece of code that relies on the formatting of the json to walk
backwards throwing away code. The problem with this approach are two
fold, first if the ind
