On 02/07/2013 08:35 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
OK, I thought you had git-write ability. I'll commit/push soon.
Actually, I found a few more issues with the code.
The piglit_swap_buffers() call should be moved after the probing code.
And you should use piglit_present_results() instead. After a
s
OK, I thought you had git-write ability. I'll commit/push soon.
-Brian
On 02/07/2013 08:23 AM, Tom Gall wrote:
Hi Brian,
It has your reviewed by.
Ideally I was looking for it to be committed unless of course there's
something egregious about it that we both missed.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:
Hi Brian,
It has your reviewed by.
Ideally I was looking for it to be committed unless of course there's
something egregious about it that we both missed.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> LGTM. Are you asking for another review or do you need someone to
> commit/push it for
LGTM. Are you asking for another review or do you need someone to
commit/push it for you?
-Brian
On 02/06/2013 03:38 PM, Tom Gall wrote:
It was a little over two weeks ago when v2 of these 2 patches to port
ttexrect to piglit and remove it from glean were posted.
It has a Reviewed-by: Brian
It was a little over two weeks ago when v2 of these 2 patches to port
ttexrect to piglit and remove it from glean were posted.
It has a Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
Any reason why this shouldn't go in?
Thanks.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Brian Paul
Date: Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:46
