Re: [Piglit] Issue with Piglit pixel ownership assumptions

2015-08-13 Thread Alexander Goins
Mirkin Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 8:56 PM To: James Jones Cc: Alexander Goins; piglit@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Piglit] Issue with Piglit pixel ownership assumptions Unfortunately the patches were attached, which greatly increases the effort required to review. Could you send

Re: [Piglit] Issue with Piglit pixel ownership assumptions

2015-08-12 Thread Ilia Mirkin
Unfortunately the patches were attached, which greatly increases the effort required to review. Could you send this out inline using git send-email or equivalent mechanism? On Aug 12, 2015 8:54 PM, James Jones jajo...@nvidia.com wrote: The PIGLIT_NO_WINDOW patch seems like the way to go to me,

Re: [Piglit] Issue with Piglit pixel ownership assumptions

2015-08-12 Thread James Jones
The PIGLIT_NO_WINDOW patch seems like the way to go to me, since defaulting to unreliable behavior seems bad, but allowing users to fall back to it to test on drivers that don't enforce pixel ownership seems fine. I'd prefer if someone outside NVIDIA could review as well, but for:

[Piglit] Issue with Piglit pixel ownership assumptions

2015-07-20 Thread Alexander Goins
Hello all, During some recent debugging, I seem to have discovered an issue with Piglit that could cause problems with some drivers. With -auto, and without -fbo or PIGLIT_FORCE_WINDOW=1, Piglit defaults to rendering to the default framebuffer without mapping a window. This means that it