> On 1 Dec 2017, at 02:11, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>
> Are there many users of Protocols.HTTP.Promise already?
>
> I made a less filling version, with slightly changed API.
> The new one is called Protocols.HTTP.Promise2 at the moment; if there are
> no objections, I'd replace HTTP.Promis
Are there many users of Protocols.HTTP.Promise already?
I made a less filling version, with slightly changed API.
The new one is called Protocols.HTTP.Promise2 at the moment; if there are
no objections, I'd replace HTTP.Promise with this one.
Most notable differences between HTTP.Promise2 and HTT