[pinhole-discussion] Re: Pinhole-Discussion digest, Vol 1 #257 - 16 msgs

2001-03-25 Thread Zernike Au
Hi Vladimir, Great Images, Thanks for sharing, I like them all. For the first images 01, is it a bear? I can't recongize it, I like the abstract form of it. I also enjoy the "couple" in the second image, they are having their "Romatic Pinholing time". Thanks for sharing once again. Zernike Vladim

Re: [pinhole-discussion] www.tinamartin.com

2001-03-25 Thread Mike Vande Bunt
Polaroid transfers are a lot of fun (at least I think so), and not nearly as hard as one might think. There are several good sites on the Internet with instructions. It does take a bit of practice to get good at the technique (really only one or two prints, if you're carefull) which is somewhat e

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New picture uploaded

2001-03-25 Thread Mike Vande Bunt
Very nice. I like blurry and impressionistic. (This is interesting because one of the things that the impressionist painters were rebelling against was that sharp [some said stark] reality captured by the then new process of photography...) Mike Vande Bunt Guy Glorieux wrote: > It was Sprind

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New picture uploaded

2001-03-25 Thread Biams
Leezy - I'm in Westchester, but in NYC two days a week. Barb

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Multiple Pinholes

2001-03-25 Thread G.Penate
> - Original Message - > From: Temi >> Would it be best to come up with a total opening and figure time from >> this or to figure time for one pinhole and then divide this by the >> number of pinholes used. - Original Message - From: "William Erickson" > My experience was that ad

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Multiple Pinholes

2001-03-25 Thread Jean Daubas
Temi, I never succeeded in finding a safe formula for my multiple pinholes cameras : there are really a lot of variables which influence the exposure . The major ones seem to be : - 1) the way you use multiple pinhole : opening /closing the various pinholes simultaneously or not. The sum of x exp

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re:Help scanning pinhole photos

2001-03-25 Thread Pam Niedermayer
Thanks, George, I've used the skew before, not for this. I need more selecting skill. :) Pam George L Smyth wrote: > > --- Pam Niedermayer wrote: > > I don't know about pinhole, but when photographing with a regular lens > > the general rule is to photograph approximately 30% overlap because >

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New picture uploaded

2001-03-25 Thread George L Smyth
--- Guy Glorieux wrote: > It was Sprind Day a few days ago. My wife had bought some tulips to > celebrate. The sun was shining inside the house. I pulled my pinhole > Brownie Hawkey and got this shot. 2 minutes hand-held. More and more, > I do these blurry, impressionistic type of images. Guy

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Re:Help scanning pinhole photos

2001-03-25 Thread George L Smyth
--- Pam Niedermayer wrote: > I don't know about pinhole, but when photographing with a regular lens > the general rule is to photograph approximately 30% overlap because > the lens introduces enough distortion that it would be impossible to > line up the adjacent shots otherwise. This can be over

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New picture uploaded

2001-03-25 Thread NORLINK
Guy Thanks for the inspiring image. I would not have thought of handholding, but the movement and blurring of parts of the image adds a deeper level of meaning for me. I've become, over the years, more interested in the essence rather than pure descriptive fact of a place or object. Happy Trail

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Multiple Pinholes

2001-03-25 Thread NORLINK
In a message dated 3/25/01 10:05:16 AM, t...@temioriginals.com writes: << Would it be best to come up with a total opening and figure time from this or to figure time for one pinhole and then divide this by the number of pinholes used. >> I would run a test roll giving each hole it's indicated

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New images

2001-03-25 Thread Pam Niedermayer
Oops, never mind that last question, I must be brain dead this morning. Pam Pam Niedermayer wrote: > > I especially like the vase; although the vase itself seems a bit > underexposed, very little detail. This is strange, since you have a > fairly large white highlight. Were you shooting film or

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New images

2001-03-25 Thread Pam Niedermayer
I especially like the vase; although the vase itself seems a bit underexposed, very little detail. This is strange, since you have a fairly large white highlight. Were you shooting film or paper? Pam Vladimir Mikovic wrote: > > Hi all, > > I uploaded 3 images at, > > http://www.p at ???/di

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New images

2001-03-25 Thread Tina Martin
Hi Vladimir! Lovely, moody images. Post more :-) Tina I uploaded 3 images at, http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o1.jpg http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o2.jpg http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o3.jpg These were done with zero2000 on paper negativ

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New picture uploaded

2001-03-25 Thread B2MYOUNG
In a message dated 3/25/01 11:46:11 AM, bi...@aol.com writes: << Guy - Really beautiful - thanks for sharing a very promising spring image (It's cold in NY today, again).I like the figure in the background. Barb >> Yes it is cold in NY today. Where are you Barb? I'm on Long Island. Are we neighb

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New to List

2001-03-25 Thread B2MYOUNG
In a message dated 3/25/01 6:32:53 AM, robin.roc...@virgin.net writes: << I recognise one or two names from the old AOL photo group (leezie?) anyway it is good to see the work >> Hi Robin. Welcome to the world of pinhole photography! You'll love it. It's addictive. Best, leezy

[pinhole-discussion] New images

2001-03-25 Thread Vladimir Mikovic
Hi all, I uploaded 3 images at, http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o1.jpg http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o2.jpg http://www.p at ???/discussion/upload/images/o3.jpg These were done with zero2000 on paper negativ (Fortespeed 3 B&W photographic paper). Comments

Re: [pinhole-discussion] New picture uploaded

2001-03-25 Thread Biams
Guy - Really beautiful - thanks for sharing a very promising spring image (It's cold in NY today, again).I like the figure in the background. Barb

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Multiple Pinholes

2001-03-25 Thread William Erickson
My experience was that adding up the areas of the multiple pinholes, dividing that into the area of an f22 aperture at the pinhole-film distance being used, and multiplying the metered f22 time by the product of the division works fine. - Original Message - From: Temi To: Cc: Temi Sent:

[pinhole-discussion] New to List

2001-03-25 Thread Robin
Greetings all, I am new to this list, but not to photography. I have started to use pinhole cameras for 5x4 Polaroid work, with a view to giving me a fresh look at picture making, as well as using it on an a trip to Greece this Autumn. I recognise one or two names from the old AOL photo group (lee

Re: [pinhole-discussion] www.tinamartin.com

2001-03-25 Thread Robin
Good to see your site Tina. I enjoyed your photos. best wishes Robin

[pinhole-discussion] Multiple Pinholes

2001-03-25 Thread Temi
What is the best way to figure the approx time when using more than one pinhole. There are a lot of variables as to placement of pinholes and sizes, etc., but what is a good starting point to experiment. Would it be best to come up with a total opening and figure time from this or to figure time fo

[pinhole-discussion] www.tinamartin.com

2001-03-25 Thread Temi
Hi Tina, Nice site - I enjoyed the transfers - will need to try this myself someday. Your "Clouds" page is labeled "Trees" - thought you might like to correct this.