I have the Epson 1200U and it was certainly a deal at $250 last year.
I guess it depends on how persnicketty you are about the final product. I
don't have any specs or experience with other transparency scanners.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Peregoy
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 20,
the 120 spool fit into the 116 w/o a filler or anything???
cool.. thanks
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of raindog
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:55 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject:
I bought an old Kodak Jr which called for 116 and successfully used 120
film. The negative size is huge though - it must be 6 x 9 or so...
so to avoid double exposure skip every other number when advancing the film.
I can't wait to hear how it turns out.
Shel
<>
The new Canon comes in two models.
The 2400UF has the transparency adaptor built in, and the 2400U doesn't.
aschm...@warwick.net (Andy Schmitt) wrote:
> I've had a pretty good experience with the Canoscan FB1200S and the
> Canon
> FilmGet FAU attachment. It has adapters for 35mm, 120 & 4x5. I
