[pinhole-discussion] (no subject)

2002-06-24 Thread Michelbayard55
I use agfa premium r.c. medium weight as negs. in film cannisters and it just feels a lot thinner than ilford.regards michey

RE: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative

2002-06-24 Thread Andy Schmitt
confirmed...Ilford is logo free... andy -Original Message- From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ??? [mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of James Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 7:40 PM To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Cannon A-1 Pinhole

2002-06-24 Thread Derek Clarke
Canon use off-the-film flash metering in TTL mode. These days they offer E-TTL which use preflash and the main body meter sensors, but for every body but a digital one you can set the flash to TTL mode manually. In article 20020622160259.98853.qm...@web11303.mail.yahoo.com, ctalcr...@yahoo.com

[pinhole-discussion] Re: Paper negs

2002-06-24 Thread JOEBESSE
You get a negative image with the pinhole camera and then you sandwich it with another piece of paper to get the positive of the image. The SW Art paper does not have developer incorporated into its emulsion like some other papers do. Joe Besse In a message dated 6/24/02 11:28:54 AM,

Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure and development times

2002-06-24 Thread George L Smyth
Jay - If reciprocity failure has caused an underexposure of the scene, then increasing the development is simply going to increase the contrast of the scene. If shadow values have not received enough exposure, then no amount of developing is going to bring them back. Cheers - george ---

Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure and development times

2002-06-24 Thread George L Smyth
--- gregg b. mc neill gbmcne...@hotmail.com wrote: [clip] The whole thing about overexpose and under develop, or underexpose to over develop never made sense to me as the conditions under which I shoot could change mid-roll. gregg mcneill Actually, this has more to do with working with

Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure and development times

2002-06-24 Thread Shannon Stoney
Gregg wrote: I, too have been noodling this. I've had sucess with taking care of all of the reciprocity corrections at the time of exposure. I process normal. The whole thing about overexpose and under develop, or underexpose to over develop never made sense to me as the conditions under

Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure and development times

2002-06-24 Thread b1jmgj58
Hello Shannon, For longer exposures I always use a water / developer technique. I expose my film normally and figure any reciprocity law failure as need and factor that into my development time like usual. I ususally use this process when I shoot at night but it also works for long exposures