RE: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative

2002-06-25 Thread Scott Guthrie
The logo on Kodak paper makes it unsuitable for using as a negative, in my experience, which is to bad because the paper is nice and I would love to suppport an American company. Mitch From: George L Smyth Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? Subject:

Re: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative

2002-06-24 Thread Scott Guthrie
I use ilford Multigrade IV and it does not have writing on the back like Kodak. Film speed about 6. Mitch Guthrie _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

Re: [pinhole-discussion] speed of paper versus film

2002-05-09 Thread Scott Guthrie
Ah now that is a fun question, while in my expirence the "speed" of enlarging paper such as Ilford Multigrade IV paper is mentioned in the documentation that value because of reciprocity and surely other factors does not translate into a related film speed. Others may have different experence.

Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole is not about "sharpness"?

2002-05-08 Thread Scott Guthrie
That is a heck of a good image, my idea of an ideal pinhole image, well executed no matter what the apeture. Mitch Guthrie From: ragowaring Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] pinhole is not about "sharpness"? Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:35:01 +0100