-Original Message-
> From: rust...@aol.com [mailto:rust...@aol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:51 PM
> To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
> Subject: [pinhole-discussion] Food for thought
>
>
> I have to agree with Jeff. I the early days of photography,
> new tec
I have to agree with Jeff. I the early days of photography, new techniques
were being introduced quite rapidly and practitioners had to continuously
learn new techniques, acquire new cameras and darkroom equipment. It wasn't
until Kodak started developing film and making prints for the masses th
> I think that idea of technological depth has some
> effect on a print's uniqueness, and more to the
> point, it directly relates to the issue I have
> been calling "authenticity." The deeper the
> technology the less the
> authenticity.
The following view may not be politically correct, on
a
I have nothing against ink jet printed images, matter of fact, I am saving
some pennies to adquire some stuff that'd allow me to do DRY darkroom from
scanning to printing.I read the following message in the
alt.photo.process list and think it is good "food for thoughts", whatever
your possition
