I just got back my first roll of film and 5x5 proofs taken with a converted
1953 Dacora Digna 6x6 slr camera. I removed the retractable lens assembly
and installed the .0087 pinhole from the pinhole set I bought from Pinhole
Resource. The focal length of this camera is approximately 36mm, so it's
w
The recent discussion re the circle and vignetting and falloff leads me to
post this.
I have been using this camera [upload gallery
http://www.???/discussion/upload/
gallery2002.php?pic=donahoe_camera.jpg ] and others like it for about 12
years now. I wouldn't think of using anything else
d,
> R.J.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip willarney [mailto:pwillar...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 3:00 PM
> To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
> Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] Question on image circle and medium
> format pinhole camera des
- Original Message -
From: "Philip willarney"
> If the edge is a slow fade from picture to dim picture
> to black, then it's falloff. Pinholes as such don't
> have an image coverage circle --
That is correct, the image circle is determined by how many stops at the
edges we are willing t
- Original Message -
From: "Fox, Robert"
> I'm thrilled with the results! The proofs are properly exposed (surprise
> given I was using a flap for the shutter and counting the seconds) on
Ilford
> XP2 film (iso 400). I used f64 as the base exposure reading, then
multiplied
> by 6.3, which
--- "Fox, Robert" wrote:
..snip..
> Question: my images are all circular, cutting off
> the corners cleanly of
> the square print. Is this because the image circle
> is too small for the
> film? I'm wondering if the circular edge of the
> front plate is being picked
> up on film, since the edge s