Amen Leonard! You're the king!
Don
Leonard Peterson lrp...@hotmail.com wrote: I know, from working years in a
camera store and teaching photography
classes, the following: Lots and lots of picture takers talk and talk
techniques to death and never making any prints. The only way to find
I know, from working years in a camera store and teaching photography
classes, the following: Lots and lots of picture takers talk and talk
techniques to death and never making any prints. The only way to find
something out is to TRY IT! In regards to reciprocity failure and
development
Jay -
If reciprocity failure has caused an underexposure of the scene, then
increasing the development is simply going to increase the contrast of the
scene. If shadow values have not received enough exposure, then no amount of
developing is going to bring them back.
Cheers -
george
---
--- gregg b. mc neill gbmcne...@hotmail.com wrote:
[clip]
The whole thing about overexpose and under develop, or underexpose to over
develop never made sense to me as the conditions under which I shoot could
change mid-roll.
gregg mcneill
Actually, this has more to do with working with
corrections with HP5+ in development times for long exposures.
--shannon
--
From: gregg b. mc neill gbmcne...@hotmail.com
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: Re: [pinhole-discussion] reciprocity failure and development times
Date: Mon, Jun 24, 2002, 6:55 AM
Sorry to have a one track
Hello Shannon,
For longer exposures I always use a water / developer technique. I expose
my film normally and figure any reciprocity law failure as need and factor
that into my development time like usual. I ususally use this process when
I shoot at night but it also works for long exposures
