Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing

2003-06-04 Thread Ingo Günther
pinhole-discussion@p at ??? schrieb am 04.06.03 05:39:45: > > just a test..mickey just a greeting from oldenburg.ingo Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail anmelden = 1qm Regenwald schuetzen! Helfen Sie mit! Nutzen Sie d

Re: [pinhole-discussion] Testing

2003-02-02 Thread MlCHlGAN
Hi Chuck, I was looking for somewhere to jump into this forum and introduce myself. Your test looked like a good spot. Hi, my name is Greg, and I am making a pinhole camera. I have been following this group for a while now. You guys are just a wealth of information. Hey, as long as Im here, i

RE: [pinhole-discussion] Testing

2003-02-02 Thread Chuck Flagg
Testing, last email to group seems to have disappeared into a black hole! :-0 Chuck

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing

2002-10-23 Thread James Kellar
I'm not sure why your past messages have picked up some html. Your message "testing" made through ok. Let's see what happens in the future. James On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 07:36 AM, wrote: My replies to messages has been blocked lately because it contains HTML code. I send in plai

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing

2002-10-23 Thread John Fisher
got your message. hope this helps From: Reply-To: pinhole-discussion@p at ??? To: "ppinhole discussion" Subject: [pinhole-discussion] testing Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:36:49 -0500 My replies to messages has been blocked lately because it contains HTML code. I send in plain text only.

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing

2002-10-23 Thread erickson
My message went through. Here is my reply. If it goes through, the HTML clearly comes from someone else. - Original Message - From: To: "ppinhole discussion" Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:36 AM Subject: [pinhole-discussion] testing > My replies to messages has been blocked lately

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing the gallery?

2001-04-30 Thread Gregg Kemp
Mike, I saw your posting to the discussion list and have corrected your statement in the exhibit. Everyone, It will help those of us reviewing the submissions to keep track of things if questions and requests of this type are sent to supp...@pinholeday.org, rather than to the discussion list.

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing the gallery?

2001-04-30 Thread Mike Vande Bunt
(Corrected typos that weren't in the version I tried to post on-line!) Mike Vande Bunt wrote: > Is there a problem with the submission form? > > I tried to include a short artist statement of well less than 100 words > and I was not able to submit the form untill I had deleted most of it. > (The

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing the gallery?

2001-04-30 Thread Mike Vande Bunt
Is there a problem with the submission form? I tried to include a short artist statement of well less than 100 words and I was not able to submit the form untill I had deleted most of it. (The submission page reported that the statement was too long!) Here is the statement that I wanted (and stil

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing the gallery?

2001-04-28 Thread Gregg Kemp
At 08:15 AM 4/28/01 -0700, you wrote: Hi everyone, I'm not sure if we are supposed to offer feedback about the pinhole day upload here on the list, but in looking at the pages for viewing the submissions, a couple of things came to mind. we'll take it any where we can get it - the more the bet

Re: [pinhole-discussion] testing the gallery?

2001-04-28 Thread Colin Talcroft
Hi everyone, I'm not sure if we are supposed to offer feedback about the pinhole day upload here on the list, but in looking at the pages for viewing the submissions, a couple of things came to mind. 1. Will there be an attempt to achieve some uniformity in the size of the images? Obviously they