- Original Message -
From: "James"
< you might take a took at this url, the history and how to of paper
> negatives, including info on william mortenson's special techniques:
> http://www.photography.about.com/library/weekly/aa051302a.htm
> James Luckett
James,
Many thanks for this very
messages of this thread, and have not been able
to figure out what has been added, as it is hidden among all the previous
replies.
John
- Original Message -
From: "George L Smyth"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:10 AM
Subject: RE: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative
&g
: RE: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Has anyone ever confirmed that the logo on the back affects the image? As
previously stated, when I tried a Kodak paper (it was probably Polycontrast
III) I saw no logo when I contact-printed the negative
Has anyone ever confirmed that the logo on the back affects the image? As
previously stated, when I tried a Kodak paper (it was probably Polycontrast
III) I saw no logo when I contact-printed the negative.
Cheers -
george
--- D Hill wrote:
>
> Another note on papers. I used to use Ilford,
Another note on papers. I used to use Ilford, but I got cranky at the price
one day so I picked up a box of Mitsubishi Gekko Matte, tried it and liked it -
and It's also great for proofs. It is a wonderful matte surface VC RC paper,
and is quite inexpensive at about $33 for 100 - 8x10. It d
confirmed...Ilford is logo free...
andy
-Original Message-
From: pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???
[mailto:pinhole-discussion-admin@p at ???]On Behalf Of James
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 7:40 PM
To: pinhole-discussion@p at ???
Subject: [pinhole-discussion] re: paper negative
I use ilford Multigrade IV and it does not have writing on the back like
Kodak. Film speed about 6.
Mitch Guthrie
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
