From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
This line:
mask = mask | mask >> 8 | mask >> 16 | mask >> 24;
only works when mask has 0s in the lower 24 bits, so add
mask &= 0xff00;
before.
Reported by Todd Rinaldo on the #cairo IRC channel.
---
pixman/pixman-mmx.c |2 ++
1 files changed, 2
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
This serves to make sure we don't accidentally reintroduce old bugs.
---
test/blitters-test.c | 43 +++
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/blitters-test.c b/test/blitters-test.c
index 5e3303
Tor Lillqvist writes:
> > A related question: Is there any support in the Windows versions of
> > GCC for either __thread or __declspec(thread)?
>
> There is support for __thread (it gets recognized by the configure
> script), but I strongly suspect it might be broken.
>
> I think I would prefe
I've pushed changes to my git repo such that the double is passed all
the way down, i.e.:
void pixman_image_set_color_tolerance (pixman_image_t* image, double
tolerance);
The mapping is essentially unchanged, we just pick a different number of
entries for the lookup tables depending on the v
Hi,
> Actually that SEGV Sven reported is familiar to me, too, since last
> weekend. It is caused by the broken implementation of SSE2 intrinsics
> in MinGW. For some reason variables of type __m128i (and __m128d,
> presumably) don't get the 16-byte alignment they require. (I don't
> know whether
> A related question: Is there any support in the Windows versions of
> GCC for either __thread or __declspec(thread)?
There is support for __thread (it gets recognized by the configure
script), but I strongly suspect it might be broken.
I think I would prefer to just use explicit code, as in the
Actually that SEGV Sven reported is familiar to me, too, since last
weekend. It is caused by the broken implementation of SSE2 intrinsics
in MinGW. For some reason variables of type __m128i (and __m128d,
presumably) don't get the 16-byte alignment they require. (I don't
know whether the __m64* type
