You just included the config logs. Can you please include the build logs as
well (the terminal output).
Your config.log clearly shows that you don't have getisax, so I don't see why
you would be having issues with it unless you overrode the config check.
configure:20209: checking for getisax
c
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Søren Sandmann wrote:
> Here are some more patches I've had sitting around for a while. They
> basically make the composite-test a little prettier by using an image
> of a parrot instead of a yellow rectangle. Screenshot:
>
> http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/com
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
The 1000_1000 name is a relic from before the refactoring.
---
pixman/pixman-fast-path.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pixman/pixman-fast-path.c b/pixman/pixman-fast-path.c
index eac8dea..0a134ed 100644
--- a/pixman/pi
From: Søren Sandmann Pedersen
---
demos/composite-test.c | 20 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/demos/composite-test.c b/demos/composite-test.c
index bba90c5..f6c3804 100644
--- a/demos/composite-test.c
+++ b/demos/composite-test.c
@@ -4,8 +
Here are some more patches I've had sitting around for a while. They
basically make the composite-test a little prettier by using an image
of a parrot instead of a yellow rectangle. Screenshot:
http://www.daimi.au.dk/~sandmann/composite-test.png
The parrot came from here
http://www.flickr.c
On 03/24/12 11:15 AM, Germán Arias wrote:
> Hi. I'm trying to build pixman 0.25.2 (since I can't compile 0.24.4, there is
> a
> problem with getisax and I can't found where is defined this function).
It's defined on machines running the Solaris kernel. If you're on another OS,
you're expected n
