Nemanja Lukic writes:
> Attached is solution for unwanted symbol visibility.
> I'll upstream both patches soon.
Were these patches ever pushed?
Søren
___
Pixman mailing list
Pixman@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/p
Siarhei Siamashka writes:
>> - compile pixman with optimizations producing statically linked
>> blitter-test (how?), rename it to blitters-test.armv6 (on rpi)
>
> You compile one binary configured as "--disable-arm-simd". And another
> one with arm-simd (armv6) optimizations still in place.
>
>
From: Pekka Paalanen
The two ARM headers contained open-coded copies of pixman_asm_function,
replace these.
Since it seems customary that ARM headers do not use CPP include guards,
rely on the .S files to #include "pixman-arm-asm.h" first. They all
already do.
---
pixman/pixman-arm-neon-asm.h |
Hi,
this thread started from
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2013-February/002619.html
and continued in
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pixman/2013-March/002677.html
I'd like to hear what the thoughts of it are now, more questions below.
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:37:06 +0100
san
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:50:03 +0300
Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:28:05 +0300
> Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > Could someone point me to a document describing how one uses these
> > testing tools properly? Hopefully it would answer all my questions
> > below.
>
> Unfortunately th
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:28:05 +0300
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you for pushing the two patches, and running extended tests. I
> will check with Ben on what to do here.
>
> Could someone point me to a document describing how one uses these
> testing tools properly? Hopefully it would an
Hi,
While building pixman-0.32.4 package on linux platform i got the build
error like "scale.c:(.text+0x8fe): undefined reference to
`pixman_filter_create_separable_convolution'"
Please find the below attached log and guide me to solve the problem.
Thanks,
Murali.
build-pixman.log
Description
