Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 4/5] lowlevel-blt-bench: Parse test name strings in general case

2015-04-07 Thread Ben Avison
Hi, Sorry for the delay in following up... On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:33:47 -, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: I understood these arrays should have been replaced by format_from_string/operator_from_string functions from patch 2 and similar new functions doing lookups in the same

[Pixman] [PATCH] lowlevel-blt-bench: Parse test name strings in general case

2015-04-07 Thread Ben Avison
There are many types of composite operation that are useful to benchmark but which are omitted from the table. Continually having to add extra entries to the table is a nuisance and is prone to human error, so this patch adds the ability to break down unknow strings of the format

Re: [Pixman] Is Pixman being maintained at all?

2015-04-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 18:46:10 -0700 Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Bill Spitzak spit...@gmail.com wrote: On 03/30/2015 10:25 AM, Matt Turner wrote: Do you just need someone to

Re: [Pixman] [PATCH 5/5] test: Add a new benchmarker targeting affine operations

2015-04-07 Thread Ben Avison
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:12:53 -, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: affine-bench should be added to .gitignore too. OK. +#define L2CACHE_SIZE (128 * 1024) I see lowlevel-blt-bench.c also uses L2CACHE_SIZE, but where does it come from? If it's really an arch/platform-independent