On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>> The ability to disabling everything except the library itself seems like a
>> good idea.
>>
>> Make sure "make test" fails if tests are disabled.
>>
>> I do think it would be nice to actu
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> The ability to disabling everything except the library itself seems like a
> good idea.
>
> Make sure "make test" fails if tests are disabled.
>
> I do think it would be nice to actually patch the tests so they compile on
> these platforms.
>
The ability to disabling everything except the library itself seems like a
good idea.
Make sure "make test" fails if tests are disabled.
I do think it would be nice to actually patch the tests so they compile on
these platforms.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Thomas Petazzoni <
thomas.petazz..
Hello,
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 09:27:46 +0200, Siarhei Siamashka wrote:
> Thanks for this patch. Though if building (and using) pixman on
> such platforms is wanted, then a much better solution would be to
> update the problematic tests and make them compile. Skipping some
> sub-tests is better than
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:31:47 +0100
Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> On certain architectures, the functionality of may not be
> available, which prevents building the pixman tests. In order to still
> allow building pixman easily on such platforms, this commit adds two
> new configure options, --disabl
On certain architectures, the functionality of may not be
available, which prevents building the pixman tests. In order to still
allow building pixman easily on such platforms, this commit adds two
new configure options, --disable-testprogs and --disable-demos, which
can be used to disable buildin
