On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:41:37 +0300
Oded Gabbay oded.gab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:27:59 +0300
Oded Gabbay oded.gab...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Fernando Seiti Furusato ferse...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:27:59 +0300
Oded Gabbay oded.gab...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Fernando Seiti Furusato ferse...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Replaced usage of vec_lvsl to direct unaligned assignment
operation (=). That is
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 18:27:59 +0300
Oded Gabbay oded.gab...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Fernando Seiti Furusato ferse...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Replaced usage of vec_lvsl to direct unaligned assignment
operation (=). That is because, according to Power ABI Specification,
the usage of lvsl is
From: Fernando Seiti Furusato ferse...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Replaced usage of vec_lvsl to direct unaligned assignment
operation (=). That is because, according to Power ABI Specification,
the usage of lvsl is deprecated on ppc64le.
Changed COMPUTE_SHIFT_{MASK,MASKS,MASKC} macro usage to no-op for
