Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-12-15 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 02:52:26 Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > The slow path reporting code discovers some interesting things, for example > 'over_n_8_8' fast path seems to be needed for the Firefox browser when > opening http://pandaboard.org/ page: > > Oct 27 02:38:15 i7 firefox: pixman slow p

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-10-30 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Friday 29 October 2010 04:17:28 Soeren Sandmann wrote: > Siarhei Siamashka writes: > > > As there are no more comments/opinions, I'm going to prepare some more or less > > final patches based on what we have now. They will be posted to the mailing > > list shortly. > > I noticed this: > > >

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-10-28 Thread Soeren Sandmann
Siarhei Siamashka writes: > As there are no more comments/opinions, I'm going to prepare some more or less > final patches based on what we have now. They will be posted to the mailing > list shortly. I noticed this: > @@ -745,7 +745,11 @@ pixman_image_composite32 (pixman_op_t op, >

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-10-26 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Wednesday 20 October 2010 15:46:57 Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > On Wednesday 20 October 2010 13:40:26 Maarten Bosmans wrote: > > 2010/10/20 Siarhei Siamashka : > > > Here is a work-in-progress branch with the initial variant slow path > > > reporting code: > > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~siamas

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-10-20 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Wednesday 20 October 2010 13:40:26 Maarten Bosmans wrote: > 2010/10/20 Siarhei Siamashka : > > Here is a work-in-progress branch with the initial variant slow path > > reporting code: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~siamashka/pixman/log/?h=perfstat-wip > > I tried to compile it for Window usin

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-10-20 Thread Maarten Bosmans
2010/10/20 Maarten Bosmans : > Below are the results for the six worst slow paths, on Windows. My app > does scrolling text (pre rendered to a cairo image surface), with > individual lines fading in and out when they come into the viewport. > > Perhaps an extra empty line after the decoded result a

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-10-20 Thread Maarten Bosmans
2010/10/20 Siarhei Siamashka : > Here is a work-in-progress branch with the initial variant slow path reporting > code: > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~siamashka/pixman/log/?h=perfstat-wip I tried to compile it for Window using mingw. It failed because pthread and syslog are unavailable. I "solved

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-10-19 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 07:01:55 Soeren Sandmann wrote: > Siarhei Siamashka writes: > > Let's face it, I think the end users rarely report performance problems > > in pixman unless the performance is really notoriously bad (and not > > ignored because "it's software rendering, so it is expect

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-09-27 Thread Soeren Sandmann
Siarhei Siamashka writes: > Let's face it, I think the end users rarely report performance problems in > pixman unless the performance is really notoriously bad (and not ignored > because "it's software rendering, so it is expected to be slow"). Finding > real > performance bottlenecks in pixma

Re: [Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-09-27 Thread Luca Barbato
On 9/27/10 3:53 PM, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: I wonder if it would make sense to add an extra configure option for the special profiling enabled pixman build which would do: [...] I like the plan, given that some platforms running pixman might not have perf/oprofile/whatever and be the most int

[Pixman] [RFC] Performance reporting capabilities for pixman?

2010-09-27 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
Hello all, Let's face it, I think the end users rarely report performance problems in pixman unless the performance is really notoriously bad (and not ignored because "it's software rendering, so it is expected to be slow"). Finding real performance bottlenecks in pixman requires running a profil