"Antti S. Lankila" writes:
> Thanks for the code review. This new patch (attached) should have all
> of these accounted for.
Pushed to master with one additional change: inwidth -> in_width and
outwidth -> out_width.
Thanks,
Søren
___
Pixman mailing
On 10.06.2012 20:03, Søren Sandmann wrote:
"Antti S. Lankila" writes:
Attached is a simple patch that produces around 20 % Mpix/s
improvement for wide path processing due to significant optimization
of pixman_expand. On my i7 laptop, we go from:
src__2x10 = L1: 62.08 L2: 60.73 M: 59
"Antti S. Lankila" writes:
> Attached is a simple patch that produces around 20 % Mpix/s
> improvement for wide path processing due to significant optimization
> of pixman_expand. On my i7 laptop, we go from:
>
>> src__2x10 = L1: 62.08 L2: 60.73 M: 59.61
>> ( 4.30%) H
Attached is a simple patch that produces around 20 % Mpix/s improvement
for wide path processing due to significant optimization of
pixman_expand. On my i7 laptop, we go from:
src__2x10 = L1: 62.08 L2: 60.73 M: 59.61
( 4.30%) HT: 46.81 VT: 42.17 R: 43.18 RT: 26.
