[Pixman] Patch to fix test for GCC vector extensions

2017-08-07 Thread Rob Tsuk
From 662b17d0d691b567a3343af3439f5fbefe989584 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Tsuk Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:11:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix test for GCC vector extensions The previous test was getting a false positive for clang version 4. --- configure.ac | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insert

Re: [Pixman] Patch to fix test for GCC vector extensions

2017-09-17 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:52:29 -0700 Rob Tsuk wrote: > From 662b17d0d691b567a3343af3439f5fbefe989584 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Rob Tsuk > Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:11:10 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Fix test for GCC vector extensions > > The previous test was getting a false positive for > c

Re: [Pixman] Patch to fix test for GCC vector extensions

2017-09-18 Thread Rob Tsuk
Your proposed modification to my patch makes sense. I’m not certain when I”ll have time to perform it. > On Sep 17, 2017, at 6:40 AM, Siarhei Siamashka > wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:52:29 -0700 > Rob Tsuk mailto:r...@tsuk.com>> wrote: > >> From 662b17d0d691b567a3343af3439f5fbefe989584 Mo

Re: [Pixman] Patch to fix test for GCC vector extensions

2017-09-18 Thread Siarhei Siamashka
On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:24:49 -0700 Rob Tsuk wrote: > > On Sep 17, 2017, at 6:40 AM, Siarhei Siamashka > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:52:29 -0700 > > Rob Tsuk mailto:r...@tsuk.com>> wrote: > > > >> From 662b17d0d691b567a3343af3439f5fbefe989584 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: Ro

Re: [Pixman] Patch to fix test for GCC vector extensions

2017-09-20 Thread Rob Tsuk
Thanks! It had been so long since I’d submitted the patch that I’d forgotten on which machine I’d done the work and what I needed to do to get set up to modify it. I’m glad you found it easy to do for me. > On Sep 18, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Siarhei Siamashka > wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 07:24: