Re: Bug#905456: Please create new list debian-clojure

2019-08-12 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sat, 04 Aug 2018, Elana Hashman wrote: > Package: lists.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Hello! > > I realize that alioth-lists.debian.net is only a temporary service and > will be going away within the next couple of years[1]. It would be > better to move the Clojure packaging list >

Re: Bug#905456: Please create new list debian-clojure

2020-09-10 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi, > I realize that alioth-lists.debian.net is only a temporary service and > will be going away within the next couple of years[1]. It would be > better to move the Clojure packaging list > sooner versus later. > I'm currently the admin of that list. > > This has been proposed as part of

Re: Bug#905456: Please create new list debian-clojure

2020-09-22 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 02:38:39PM -0700, Elana Hashman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 09:52:40PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > Sorry for joining late. Could you please upgrade the list of subscribers > > and provide me with the archive of the old alioth list?

Re: Bug#905456: Please create new list debian-clojure

2021-05-24 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 06:43:08PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:23:10 -0800 Elana Hashman > > wrote: > > > On 2021-03-10 11:34, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > Uh, oh. Yeah, please. &

Re: Bug#905456: Please create new list debian-clojure

2021-05-24 Thread Alexander Wirt
Hi, > On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:23:10 -0800 Elana Hashman wrote: > > On 2021-03-10 11:34, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > [...] > > > Uh, oh. Yeah, please. > > > > There's been no objections since this email was last sent -- anyone on > > the list who does

Re: Bug#905456: Please create new list debian-clojure

2021-03-10 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:04:39AM -0700, Elana Hashman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > ehm, but you asked on the list if subscribers should get subscribed to > > the new list? > > I did upon initial list reques