Re: [pkg-go] pkg-go will migrate to salsa.debian.org on 2018-04-02

On ചൊവ്വ 03 ഏപ്രിൽ 2018 09:46 രാവിലെ, Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 2018-04-02 12:27 PM, Alexandre Viau wrote:> I am starting the > migration now. > > The migration was completed. > Thanks! > There are leftover packages with permissions issues in > git.debian.org:/git/pkg-go/packages: > > -

[pkg-go] Bug#894277: gitaly is not configured and not starting with a custom configuration

Package: gitaly Version: 0.91.0+debian-1 Severity: grave Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/1119 Control: affects -1 gitlab This breaks gitlab. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] gitlab-workhorse on salsa is moved to go-team/packages from ruby-team

Hi, Initially this was the only gitlab dependency using go and I thought it better to have it under ruby team so its easier to manage. Now golang-gitaly-proto, gitaly and their dependencies are already under go team and it is natural to move gitlab-workhorse there. Please update your local repos.

Re: [pkg-go] Bug#894131: Bug#894131: prometheus-alertmanager: New upstream release 0.14.0 available. Please package and backport to stretch.

On ചൊവ്വ 27 മാർച്ച് 2018 06:21 വൈകു, Martín Ferrari wrote: >> What exactly in Debian policy is preventing us shipping Alertmanager >> built as intended by upstream? > > I don't remember which section in the Policy that is. But those > generated files are not source code, and therefore there is a

[pkg-go] Bug#893171: it is just an older version of grpc I think

Control: retitle -1 Update golang-google-grpc-dev to new upstream release Control: reassign -1 golang-google-grpc-dev Control: found -1 1.6.0-3 Correcting bug meta data. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-go-maintainers

[pkg-go] Bug#893171: Support non git packages

Package: dh-make-golang Version: 0.0~git20180129.37f630a-1+b1 severity: wishlist I'm trying to update gitaly to new upstream version. I got src/gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/internal/rubyserver/balancer/balancer.go:24:2: cannot find package "google.golang.org/grpc/resolver" in any of:

Re: [pkg-go] Getting a new list for actual discussions

On 2018, ജനുവരി 29 9:11:17 AM IST, Alexandre Viau wrote: >Hello, > >This list is pretty spammy. How do you guys keep up with actual >discussions? Do you use filters? > >I personally missed out on discussions because I didn't see the >messages. > >I was wondering if pkg-go

[pkg-go] Bug#886816: Removing golang-go.uber-zap or zap

On 2018, ജനുവരി 29 9:00:58 AM IST, Alexandre Viau wrote: >Hello, > >I have uploaded a duplicate of src:zap as src:golang-go.uber-zap. > >I don't know why I missed src:zap. Probably because it didn't follow >the >pkg-go naming guidelines, but even then, dh-make-golang should

Re: [pkg-go] Comments regarding zap_1.5.0+git20170802.3.e68420e-1_amd64.changes

On ബുധന്‍ 06 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 05:15 വൈകു, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > (not from ftp-master, just team member of pkg-go, and not cc ftp-master) > > Why ship this /usr/bin/zap-readme? I don't think this is a useful > binary for users. ok, We can remove it from next upload. > the readme binary is

Re: [pkg-go] Comments regarding zap_1.5.0+git20170802.3.e68420e-1_amd64.changes

On ശനി 02 സെപ്റ്റംബര്‍ 2017 12:57 വൈകു, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi, > > /usr/bin/readme is too generic to be placed under a location defined in PATH. > Would it be possible to use a more specialized name, such as zap-readme? > done. > Cheers, > Luca > > > >

[pkg-go] Bug#872015: convert import path to url for homepage and source

package: dh-golang version: 1.22 severity: wishlist example package go.uber.org/atomic. Same for Source in copyright. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[pkg-go] Bug#872016: use licensecheck to autodetect license

package: dh-golang version: 1.22 severity: wishlist example package go.uber.org/atomic signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

[pkg-go] Bug#871983: cache the downloaded files

On Sun, 13 Aug 2017 11:59:05 +0530 Pirate Praveen <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote:> Would it also be possible to not clone the entire history? > I think git clone --depth 1 would be enough to generate the orig tar ball and determine the version. signature.asc Description: Ope

[pkg-go] Bug#871983: cache the downloaded files

package: dh-make-golang severity: wishlist currently dh-make-golang downloads/clones repos every time it is run. It would be better to allow caching as an option so you can reuse the already downloaded copies. This is useful when you don't have a fast internet connection (my personal case, I

[pkg-go] Bug#871902: Bug#871902: Bug#871902: add golang support to dh-make

On ശനി 12 ആഗസ്റ്റ് 2017 06:06 വൈകു, Shengjing Zhu wrote: > > Hi, > > I think we have dh-make-golang already, please see the following > links for reference. > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/dh-make-golang > https://github.com/debian/dh-make-golang >

[pkg-go] Bug#871902: add golang support to dh-make

package: dh-make, dh-golang severity: wishlist Currently we have to use dh-make to create a generic debian directory and edit rules to add golang support. We also need to edit control file to add dependency on golang. Both of these could be automated. It would be nice to have direct support for

[pkg-go] Bug#835661: Pending fixes for bugs in the prometheus package

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 01:34:24 + pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote: > Commit message: > > Replace libjs-handlebars with libjs-mustache. Closes: #835661. Great to see prometheus remaining in main by removing dependency on libjs-handlebars. Any blockers to this upload? I'd

[pkg-go] help fixing gitlab-workhorse build failure on s390x

[cc me on replies from s390 list] gitlab-workhorse is blocking gitlab 8.12.3 migration to testing for sometime now. I fixed two issues with powerpc build but this issue seems hard to crack. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843148 for details Any help fixing this issue would

Re: [pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

[Adding GCC Maintainers (please cc me on replies)] On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:01 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Can some one who knows golang well, respond to this question from > upstream https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/issues/112 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sig

Re: [pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

[Adding GCC Maintainers (please cc me on replies)] On Wednesday 02 November 2016 04:01 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Can some one who knows golang well, respond to this question from > upstream https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/issues/112 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sig

Re: [pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

On Wednesday 02 November 2016 01:00 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Can someone here help with this package? Details here > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842897 Can some one who knows golang well, respond to this question from upstream https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/

[pkg-go] Bug#842897: Bug#842897: Bug#842897: fix test failure with gccgo

Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/getsentry/raven-go/issues/112 On Wednesday 02 November 2016 02:55 PM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > This looks like an upstream problem, have you reported in there? It > looks like a test depending on details of the function names you get > from

[pkg-go] Need help fixing raven-go with gccgo

Hi, Can someone here help with this package? Details here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=842897 I need this package for gitlab-workhorse (and in turn gitlab). Thanks Praveen signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

[pkg-go] Bug#842897: fix test failure with gccgo

package: golang-raven-go version: 0.0~git20150721.0.74c334d-1 severity: important Need this to make gitlab-workhorse buildable again on powerpc https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gitlab-workhorse go test -v -p 1 github.com/getsentry/raven-go === RUN TestPacketJSON --- PASS:

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Tuesday 25 October 2016 06:10 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hi, > > On 25/10/16 06:57, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> On Wednesday 12 October 2016 08:19 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: >>> I need to check with upstream if they are breaking API compatibility for >>> good, and

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On Wednesday 12 October 2016 08:19 PM, Martín Ferrari wrote: > I need to check with upstream if they are breaking API compatibility for > good, and in that case will need to create a new package with a API > version embedded. What do you think the best here now? I have to fix

Re: [pkg-go] Sponsor uploads of golang-github-hlandau-{goutils, buildinfo, dexlogconfig}

On 2016, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 12 8:24:57 PM IST, "Martín Ferrari" wrote: > >> Done. To test compilation with gccgo, I temporarily replaced the >build >> dependency on golang-any with gccgo-6, but the build fails on amd64: >> >> dh build --buildsystem=golang --with=golang >>

Re: [pkg-go] golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go_3.0.0-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

On ചൊവ്വ 11 ഒക്ടോബര്‍ 2016 10:36 വൈകു, Martín Ferrari wrote: > OK, please do the same with both libraries, and revert any other changes > you have done. Reverted both packages to previous versions. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[pkg-go] Bug#839597: Bug#839597: Bug#839597: update golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go to new upstream release

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:52:48 +0200 Martín Ferrari wrote: > I will take a look at your changes, but I would be interested in seeing > which failures you are getting with gcc-go and on which architecture. I got this test failure on amd64. I ran # dpkg -r --force-all golang-go #

[pkg-go] Bug#839597: Bug#839597: update golang-github-dgrijalva-jwt-go to new upstream release

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 00:08:48 +0200 Martín Ferrari wrote: > I don't usually work with this package, but be careful when updating > this as 3.0 has breaking changes that might affect rdependencies: > > https://github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go/blob/master/VERSION_HISTORY.md I have

[pkg-go] Bug#835661: Bug#835661: drop dependency on libjs-handlebars

On 2016, ആഗസ്റ്റ് 29 8:40:00 AM IST, "Martín Ferrari" <tin...@debian.org> wrote: >Hi, > >On 28/08/16 08:33, Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> libjs-handlebars is missing source (see >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830986 and >> htt

[pkg-go] Bug#835661: drop dependency on libjs-handlebars

package: prometheus version: 1.0.1+ds-1 severity: serious libjs-handlebars is missing source (see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830986 and https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830978). I'm planning to drop this package (other option is to keep in non-free) soon.