[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#424635: marked as done (mapserver FTBFS due to missing libgdal1-1.3.2-dev)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424635: fixed in mapserver 4.10.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#418313: marked as done (php4: Should not be included in Lenny)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#418313: fixed in mapserver 4.10.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#415504: marked as done ([INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415504: fixed in mapserver 4.10.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#416449: marked as done (error in last sentence of description)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416449: fixed in mapserver 4.10.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#423538: marked as done (mapserver: FTBFS: Build depends on libgdal1-1.3.2-dev)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 22:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423538: fixed in mapserver 4.10.1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

[DebianGIS-dev] r848 - packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/patches

2007-05-20 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2007-05-20 22:11:45 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 848 Added: packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/patches/80_gdal_lib.dpatch Log: Adding missing patch file :-/ Added: packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/patches/80_gdal_lib.dpatch =

[DebianGIS-dev] r847 - packages/mapserver/trunk/debian

2007-05-20 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2007-05-20 22:09:06 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 847 Modified: packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/changelog packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/rules Log: Removing dh_python Modified: packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/changelog ===

[DebianGIS-dev] r846 - packages/mapserver/trunk/debian

2007-05-20 Thread frankie
Author: frankie Date: 2007-05-20 21:50:29 + (Sun, 20 May 2007) New Revision: 846 Added: packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/compat Modified: packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/changelog packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/control packages/mapserver/trunk/debian/rules Log: Merging from BSP NMU

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#422772: marked as done (qgis - FTBFS: link: `/usr/lib/libhdf5.la' is not a valid libtool archive)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 23:28:41 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Will be fixed in next build has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respon

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#416449: marked as done (error in last sentence of description)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 17:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416449: fixed in mapserver 4.10.0-6.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#424635: marked as done (mapserver FTBFS due to missing libgdal1-1.3.2-dev)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 17:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#424635: fixed in mapserver 4.10.0-6.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#418313: marked as done (php4: Should not be included in Lenny)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 17:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#418313: fixed in mapserver 4.10.0-6.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#415504: marked as done ([INTL:nl] Dutch po-debconf translation)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 17:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#415504: fixed in mapserver 4.10.0-6.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#423538: marked as done (mapserver: FTBFS: Build depends on libgdal1-1.3.2-dev)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 20 May 2007 17:02:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#423538: fixed in mapserver 4.10.0-6.1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#419827: marked as done (FTBFS with GCC 4.3: missing #includes)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 07:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#419827: fixed in gdal 1.4.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#421992: marked as done (libgdal1-dev: Should depend on libhdf5-serial-dev)

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 May 2007 07:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#421992: fixed in gdal 1.4.1-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

[DebianGIS-dev] mapserver_4.10.0-6.1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2007-05-20 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: cgi-mapserver_4.10.0-6.1_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mapserver/cgi-mapserver_4.10.0-6.1_i386.deb mapserver-bin_4.10.0-6.1_i386.deb to pool/main/m/mapserver/mapserver-bin_4.10.0-6.1_i386.deb mapserver-doc_4.10.0-6.1_all.deb to pool/main/m/mapserver/mapserver-doc_4.10.0-6.1_all.deb mapse

[DebianGIS-dev] Processing of mapserver_4.10.0-6.1_i386.changes

2007-05-20 Thread Archive Administrator
mapserver_4.10.0-6.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: mapserver_4.10.0-6.1.dsc mapserver_4.10.0-6.1.diff.gz mapserver-doc_4.10.0-6.1_all.deb php5-mapscript_4.10.0-6.1_i386.deb perl-mapscript_4.10.0-6.1_i386.deb cgi-mapserver_4.10.0-6.1_i386.deb pyt

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#425284: mapserver: diff for NMU version 4.10.0-6.1

2007-05-20 Thread Luk Claes
Package: mapserver Version: 4.10.0-6 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, Attached is the diff for my mapserver 4.10.0-6.1 NMU during the current BSP which I'll upload to delayed-0. -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999