[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#500535: libjdom0 vs. lenny

2008-10-20 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 500539 important thanks Thomas Viehmann wrote: > In order to be fixed for lenny, changing the libjdom0 must be done in a > way that is release compatible (in particular, no new upstream version). > If that cannot reasonably be done for lenny,

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#500535: openjump: please migrate to libjdom1-java

2008-09-29 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Does this require code changes in openjump? Possibly. The CHANGES file in JDOM 1.1 does not extend that far back, but there are some more recent API breakages listed. Probably it is best to convince upstream to upgrade. M

[DebianGIS-dev] Bug#500535: openjump: please migrate to libjdom1-java

2008-09-29 Thread Marcus Better
Package: openjump Severity: wishlist Please migrate from libjdom0-java to libjdom1-java if possible, so that the former (JDOM 0.9) can be phased out. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Archi