On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 20:10:17 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:01:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I guess the best would be to reintroduce them but as part of a separate
libhdf5-cpp-7 binary
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:24:58PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:34:20AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
First because having more than one shared lib per binary package is a
recipe for trouble down the road. Second, the c++ libs were only built
with the
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:01:12PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
I guess the best would be to reintroduce them but as part of a separate
libhdf5-cpp-7 binary package (the reason I dropped them was that they
were in libhdf5-7 but not in the mpi variants, which meant the mpi
variants didn't
Package: hdf5-helpers
Version: 1.8.8-7.1
Severity: normal
The manpage is present, but nothing in /usr/bin:
steve@riemann{~}dpkg -L hdf5-helpers
/.
/usr
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/hdf5-helpers
/usr/share/doc/hdf5-helpers/copyright
/usr/share/doc/hdf5-helpers/changelog.gz
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-7.1
Severity: normal
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them.
That's not true. I need C++ libraries for ITK. Please re-enable.
Thanks,
-Steve
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:37:49PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 13:40:03 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Package: hdf5
Version: 1.8.8-7.1
Severity: normal
hdf5 (1.8.8-7.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Stop building the c++ libraries, nothing uses them
Hi,
I'd like to contribute towards a solution for this. I'm forwarding to
debian-devel to get some others' ideas.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:57:39AM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Le mardi 31 janvier 2012 à 21:56 -0600, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
Naively, I don't understand why netcdf can't
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:41:06PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
reassign 657949 hdf5
forcemerge 591346 657949
thanks
Le lundi 30 janvier 2012 à 00:02 -0600, Steve M. Robbins a écrit :
Package: libhdf5-mpi-dev
Version: 1.8.8-5
Severity: important
I can install libhdf5-mpi-dev
Package: libhdf5-mpi-dev
Version: 1.8.8-5
Severity: important
I can install libhdf5-mpi-dev
I can install libnetcdf-dev
but I cannot install both together:
root@riemann:/tmp/minc-2.1.00# apt-get install libhdf5-mpi-dev libnetcdf-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:20:16AM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 04:45:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 26/12/11 at 22:40 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
It would be quite helpful to do a rebuild of the 237 boost reverse
dependencies. Lucas Nussbaum seems
(0.18-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * control: Switch to non-versioned boost build-dependencies.
+(Closes: #630434).
+
+ -- Steve M. Robbins s...@debian.org Sat, 23 Jul 2011 00:22:40 -0500
+
dans-gdal-scripts (0.18-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
Source: dans-gdal-scripts
Severity: normal
Hi,
This bug is being filed against all packages that build-depend on one
of the Boost 1.42 -dev packages. Boost 1.42 has been obsoleted by
1.46 and will be removed; see #623989.
Please update the build dependencies package dans-gdal-scripts. If
Hello,
The packages in the to line are currently build-depend on boost 1.40
-dev packages.
We recently changed the boost-defaults to 1.42. I'd like to remove
boost 1.40 from the archive fairly soon.
Can you let me know whether:
1. your package builds with Boost 1.42
and you will upload
Hello,
I'm pleased to announce the upload of boost-defaults, a new package
that supplies unversioned -dev packages for Boost (libboost-dev, etc.)
that simply depend on the current default Boost version (today, it
is Boost 1.38.0).
This means that libboost-dev and friends have effectively been
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 05:39:02PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Steve,
I have no intention of turning this into a best practices flamewar or
drawn-out discussion.
That's fine. I'm not interested in a drawn-out discussion either. I
asked the questions because at first I wasn't sure
Hello Dirk,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:10:04PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
Open MPI 1.3, released a few days ago, recommends a rebuild of its
dependencies.
Given the fairly small number of affected packages, we are hoping do drive
this rebuild 'informally' rather than with the full
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:52:18AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 1 February 2009 at 00:37, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
| Hello Dirk,
|
| On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:10:04PM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| Open MPI 1.3, released a few days ago, recommends a rebuild of its
Package: hdf5
Severity: wishlist
As you know, building against MPI is tricky. Lots of folks have
adopted a strategy of building against OpenMPI on architectures it
supports and using LAM for the rest [1]. However, that means the
knowledge of which architectures can build OpenMPI is replicated
18 matches
Mail list logo
