On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Andreas Putzo wrote:
> > About that, isn't that the case to follow josm versioning (i.e. svn release)
> > instead of the timestamp-like version used currently ?
>
> My understanding is that this is more or less a matter of personal
> preference. But josm
On Dec 22 12:09, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 04:39:29PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >
> > retitle josm: Please package new upstream version
> > thanks
> >
> > [Alex Ruddick]
> > > NOTE: I run Ubuntu and have never submitted a proper Debian bug, so
> > > I modi
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 04:39:29PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> retitle josm: Please package new upstream version
> thanks
>
> [Alex Ruddick]
> > NOTE: I run Ubuntu and have never submitted a proper Debian bug, so
> > I modified an earlier one. I have no idea if this is the proper way
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
