On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Ok, as asked by the originator of this request, currently I see
no specific problems in moving to use debian-...@l.d.o and
debian-gis-committ...@l.d.o,
Just to clarify the list request issue (where I was the originator):
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:17:30AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:23:53PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Ok, as asked by the originator of this request, currently I see
no specific problems in moving to use debian-...@l.d.o and
debian-gis-committ...@l.d.o,
Hi Francesco,
uhmm, I I think I added even more confusioin to this issue than it
was. Sorry for this.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
Sorry Andreas, but if I understood correctly your suggestion, you are
proposing a non-packaging list for GIS related
Ok, as asked by the originator of this request, currently I see
no specific problems in moving to use debian-...@l.d.o and
debian-gis-committ...@l.d.o, but for the fact that the the main
list is an open one (with probably a better antispam management).
Other people did express some concerns about
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi listmasters,
after some discussion on the pkg-grass mailing lists[1] which are currently
used to do general discussions and not only issues about packaging GRASS
we came up with the conclusion that it is better to have a dedicated
mailing list for
5 matches
Mail list logo
