Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

Source: ghc Version: 7.10.3-2 Severity: serious Your package failed to build on armel: "inplace/bin/ghc-stage1" -static -H32m -O -lffi -optl-pthread -optl-B/usr/bin/ld.gold -Iincludes -Iincludes/dist -Iincludes/dist-derivedconstants/header -Iincludes/dist-ghcconstants/header -Irts -Irts/dist/

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

On 20/12/15 11:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I have also talked to upstream and the general opinion is that ARM > support generally still needs lots of work, independent of this > particular bug now so I assume that in the future, we will be able > to drop this workaround again and hopeful

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

On 20/12/15 13:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/20/2015 01:21 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> needs a lot of work != someone is doing a lot of work on it. So unless >> someone >> is and you didn't say it, or you are volunteering to do it, I'm not s

Bug#807020: ghc: FTBFS on armel: selected processor does not support `strd r0, r1, [r7, #64]' in ARM mode

On 20/12/15 14:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 12/20/2015 01:42 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> I know nothing about haskell upstream, so the fact that armel got broken for >> so >> long even though it was pointed out by Joachim in several mails made me

Bug#818797: haskell-shake: FTBFS on powerpc: timed out

Source: haskell-shake Version: 0.15.5+dfsg-4 Severity: serious Your package failed to build on powerpc: ## FINISHED TESTING directory ## BUILD docs test ## TESTING docs ## BUILD docs --abbrev=output=$OUT -j3 # runhaskell (for $OUT/docs/dist/setup-config) Configuring shake-0.15.5... E: Caught sign

Bug#830540: gitit: FTBFS on arm64: /usr/bin/ld.gold: internal error in fix_errata, at ../../gold/aarch64.cc:1958

Source: gitit Version: 0.12.1.1+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Your package failed to build on arm64: Erratum 843419 found and fixed at "/usr/lib/ghc/ghc_0AG9TOjDEtx4Ji3wSwHOBe/libHSghc-7.10.3-0AG9TOjDEtx4Ji3wSwHOBe.a(Base.o)", section 1, offset 0x00018890. Erratum 843419 found and fixed at "/usr/li

Bug#832824: haskell-src-exts: fails to build on mips64el: ghc_8.hc:(.text+0x10c): relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_GOT_DISP against `stg_ap_0_fast'

Source: haskell-src-exts Version: 1.17.1-1 Severity: serious Your package has been failing to build on mips64el for a while now: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-src-exts&arch=mips64el >From the last two logs: [22 of 24] Compiling Language.Haskell.Exts.Parser ( src/Languag

Re: Bug#818561: Useless in Debian

On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:34:43 +0200 Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote: > Hi David, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:11PM, David Prévot wrote: > > Le 31/10/2016 à 13:25, Axel Beckert a écrit : > > > JFTR: The recent hoogle update pulled this in. So it seems no more > > > usele

Bug#850915: ghc: Please switch to llvm 3.8 or, better, 3.9

On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:21:54 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Source: ghc > Severity: important > > Hello, > > The armel build issue on 3.8 and 3.9 has been fixed thanks to a fix in > libstdc++. > ghc can now change llvm version. > > This is the last package using llvm 3.7, blocking its removal.

Bug#886222: ld.gold: internal error in get_got_page_offset, at ../../gold/mips.cc:6271

Source: binutils Version: 2.29.1-12 Severity: important Control: affects -1 ghc Hi, gold segfaults when building ghc 8.2.2-1 on mips*: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ghc&ver=8.2.2-1 Gianfranco tried with binutils 2.29.51.20171218-1 as well and that failed too. Unfortunately he cl