Source: binutils
Version: 2.29.1-12
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 ghc
Hi,
gold segfaults when building ghc 8.2.2-1 on mips*:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ghc&ver=8.2.2-1
Gianfranco tried with binutils 2.29.51.20171218-1 as well and that failed too.
Unfortunately he cl
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 09:21:54 +0100 Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Source: ghc
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> The armel build issue on 3.8 and 3.9 has been fixed thanks to a fix in
> libstdc++.
> ghc can now change llvm version.
>
> This is the last package using llvm 3.7, blocking its removal.
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:34:43 +0200 Ilias Tsitsimpis
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:11PM, David Prévot wrote:
> > Le 31/10/2016 à 13:25, Axel Beckert a écrit :
> > > JFTR: The recent hoogle update pulled this in. So it seems no more
> > > usele
Source: haskell-src-exts
Version: 1.17.1-1
Severity: serious
Your package has been failing to build on mips64el for a while now:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=haskell-src-exts&arch=mips64el
>From the last two logs:
[22 of 24] Compiling Language.Haskell.Exts.Parser (
src/Languag
Source: gitit
Version: 0.12.1.1+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Your package failed to build on arm64:
Erratum 843419 found and fixed at
"/usr/lib/ghc/ghc_0AG9TOjDEtx4Ji3wSwHOBe/libHSghc-7.10.3-0AG9TOjDEtx4Ji3wSwHOBe.a(Base.o)",
section 1, offset 0x00018890.
Erratum 843419 found and fixed at
"/usr/li
Source: haskell-shake
Version: 0.15.5+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Your package failed to build on powerpc:
## FINISHED TESTING directory
## BUILD docs test
## TESTING docs
## BUILD docs --abbrev=output=$OUT -j3
# runhaskell (for $OUT/docs/dist/setup-config)
Configuring shake-0.15.5...
E: Caught sign
On 20/12/15 14:02, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/20/2015 01:42 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> I know nothing about haskell upstream, so the fact that armel got broken for
>> so
>> long even though it was pointed out by Joachim in several mails made me
On 20/12/15 13:30, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/20/2015 01:21 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> needs a lot of work != someone is doing a lot of work on it. So unless
>> someone
>> is and you didn't say it, or you are volunteering to do it, I'm not s
On 20/12/15 11:09, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I have also talked to upstream and the general opinion is that ARM
> support generally still needs lots of work, independent of this
> particular bug now so I assume that in the future, we will be able
> to drop this workaround again and hopeful
Source: ghc
Version: 7.10.3-2
Severity: serious
Your package failed to build on armel:
"inplace/bin/ghc-stage1" -static -H32m -O -lffi -optl-pthread
-optl-B/usr/bin/ld.gold -Iincludes -Iincludes/dist
-Iincludes/dist-derivedconstants/header -Iincludes/dist-ghcconstants/header
-Irts -Irts/dist/
10 matches
Mail list logo