Processing of libxml-security-java_2.0.10-1_source.changes

libxml-security-java_2.0.10-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libxml-security-java_2.0.10-1.dsc libxml-security-java_2.0.10.orig.tar.xz libxml-security-java_2.0.10-1.debian.tar.xz libxml-security-java_2.0.10-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, You

libxml-security-java_2.0.10-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:46:30 +0200 Source: libxml-security-java Binary: libxml-security-java libxml-security-java-doc Architecture: source Version: 2.0.10-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Ma

Bug#904585: java-common: Please bump m68k to openjdk-10

Source: java-common Version: 0.67 Severity: normal Tags: patch User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: m68k Hi! I have successfully bootstrapped openjdk-10 for m68k now [1], we can therefore now make openjdk-10 the default JDK on m68k. Please apply the attached patch to make the necessary mo

Bug#863337: visualvm: Typos in launcher script - does not start anymore

Package: visualvm Version: 1.3.9-1 Followup-For: Bug #863337 Dear Maintainer, I am also seeing this issue: $ java -version openjdk version "1.8.0_171" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_171-8u171-b11-1~deb9u1-b11) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.171-b11, mixed mode) $ visualvm Unknown o

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 875365 by 884186 Bug #875365 [src:glassfish] FTBFS with Java 9: sun.misc 875365 was not blocked by any bugs. 875365 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 875365: 884186 > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contac

Processing of libapache-poi-java_3.12-1_source.changes

libapache-poi-java_3.12-1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache-poi-java_3.12-1.dsc libapache-poi-java_3.12.orig.tar.xz libapache-poi-java_3.12-1.debian.tar.xz libapache-poi-java_3.12-1_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemo

libapache-poi-java_3.12-1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 23:00:27 +0200 Source: libapache-poi-java Binary: libapache-poi-java libapache-poi-java-doc Architecture: source Version: 3.12-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainer

Processed: Re: Bug#488989: how to obtain JNI_CreateJavaVM/libjvm?

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + wontfix Bug #488989 [java-common] how to obtain JNI_CreateJavaVM/libjvm? Added tag(s) wontfix. > close -1 Bug #488989 [java-common] how to obtain JNI_CreateJavaVM/libjvm? Marked Bug as done -- 488989: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=4889

Bug#488989: how to obtain JNI_CreateJavaVM/libjvm?

Control: tags -1 + wontfix Control: close -1 gcj and postgresql-pljava are both gone now, I don't think the initial question is still relevant. __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debi

Processed: Re: java-common: update default-java when setting new alternantive

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 701791 java-common: update default-java when setting new alternative Bug #701791 [java-common] java-common: update default-java when setting new alternantive Changed Bug title to 'java-common: update default-java when setting new alterna

Bug#829008: update-java-alternatives always switches back to default

Le 29/06/2016 à 20:40, Paul Draper a écrit : > I presume that do_auto was at one time important > for something, though I have no idea what it was. do_auto is the function called when update-java-alternatives is called with the --auto option. This resets to the highest priority JRE. I'm not sure

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 641880 wishlist Bug #641880 [default-jdk] Please create default-jdk-source Ignoring request to change severity of Bug 641880 to the same value. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 641

Processed: Bug #904585 in java-common marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #904585 [src:java-common] java-common: Please bump m68k to openjdk-10 Added tag(s) pending. -- 904585: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904585 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the

Processing of java-common_0.68_source.changes

java-common_0.68_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: java-common_0.68.dsc java-common_0.68.tar.xz java-common_0.68_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian

java-common_0.68_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 23:47:52 +0200 Source: java-common Binary: java-common default-jre default-jre-headless default-jdk default-jdk-headless default-jdk-doc Architecture: source Version: 0.68 Distribution: unstable Urgenc

Bug#901571: marked as done (java-common: Please move powerpcspe to the list of Java 10 architectures)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:04:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#901571: fixed in java-common 0.68 has caused the Debian Bug report #901571, regarding java-common: Please move powerpcspe to the list of Java 10 architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#904585: marked as done (java-common: Please bump m68k to openjdk-10)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:04:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#904585: fixed in java-common 0.68 has caused the Debian Bug report #904585, regarding java-common: Please bump m68k to openjdk-10 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Re: Advice for building tomcat8 on jessie?

On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 06:42:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:09:06PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:35:50PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > > > Hi Roberto, > > > > > > I was able to build your jessie branch in clean jessie chroot without