Bug#924224: uima-utils: broken symlink: /usr/share/uima/lib/uima-adapter-soap.jar -> ../../java/uimaj-adapter-soap.jar

Package: uima-utils Version: 2.10.2-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates) a broken symlink. >From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): 0m51.7s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks: /usr/

Bug#887666: jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N

On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 09:45:03 +0200 Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 07/04/2018 à 19:55, Niels Thykier a écrit : > > > I have written some patches to rewrite most of the javatools helpers > > into perl using Debhelper's Dh_Lib[1]. This would fix this problem and > > avoid future instances of it. > > Th

Processing of javatools_0.72.3_source.changes

javatools_0.72.3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: javatools_0.72.3.dsc javatools_0.72.3.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

javatools_0.72.3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:11:09 + Source: javatools Architecture: source Version: 0.72.3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Andrej Shadura Closes: 887666 Changes: ja

Bug#887666: marked as done (jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 12:34:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#887666: fixed in javatools 0.72.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #887666, regarding jh_linkjars: Invalid option: N to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#924224: uima-utils: broken symlink: /usr/share/uima/lib/uima-adapter-soap.jar -> ../../java/uimaj-adapter-soap.jar

Hi, On 2019-03-10 13:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > 0m51.7s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks: > /usr/share/uima/lib/uima-adapter-soap.jar -> > ../../java/uimaj-adapter-soap.jar (uima-utils) > > The targeted file is not available in any package in sid. the uimaj-adapter-soap is ignored (not built) i

Processing of jruby-joni_2.1.26-2_source.changes

jruby-joni_2.1.26-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: jruby-joni_2.1.26-2.dsc jruby-joni_2.1.26-2.debian.tar.xz jruby-joni_2.1.26-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer

Processed: Re: Bug#924256: openjpeg2: FTBFS: Can't exec "jh_build": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh line 908.

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 javahelper 0.72.3 Bug #924256 [src:openjpeg2] openjpeg2: FTBFS: Can't exec "jh_build": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh line 908. Bug reassigned from package 'src:openjpeg2' to 'javahelper'. No longer marked as found in versions openjpeg2/2.3.0-1

Bug#924256: openjpeg2: FTBFS: Can't exec "jh_build": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh line 908.

Control: reassign -1 javahelper 0.72.3 Control: forcemerge 923748 924256 Control: retitle -1 shebang line in jh_build "#!/use/bin/perl" On 2019-03-10 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Source: openjpeg2 > Version: 2.3.0-1.1 > Severity: serious > Justification: ftbfs > Hi > While trying to adress sev

Re: Accepted javatools 0.72.3 (source) into unstable

On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 16:39, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Hello Andrej and Java Maintainers. > > It is possible/likely that this upload has just broken src:png-sixlegs? > > This package built ok seven hours ago: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=png%2dsixlegs > > but not anymore: > >

Processed: Re: Bug#924256: openjpeg2: FTBFS: Can't exec "jh_build": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh line 908.

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses > packages in the unnamed module Bug #924256 [javahelper] shebang line in jh_build "#!/use/bin/perl" Bug #923748 [javahelper] shebang line in jh_build "#!/use/bin/perl" Bug #923751 [javahelper] s

Bug#924256: openjpeg2: FTBFS: Can't exec "jh_build": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh line 908.

Control: retitle -1 javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Hi, Am 10.03.19 um 18:15 schrieb Andreas Metzler: > Control: reassign -1 javahelper 0.72.3 > Control: forcemerge 923748 924256 > Control: retitle -1 shebang line in jh_build "#!/use/bin

Processed: Bug #923748 in javatools marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #923748 [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Bug #923751 [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Bug #923753 [javah

Processing of javatools_0.72.4_source.changes

javatools_0.72.4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: javatools_0.72.4.dsc javatools_0.72.4.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#924256: openjpeg2: FTBFS: Can't exec "jh_build": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/dh line 908.

Hi Andreas, On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 06:15:50PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Control: reassign -1 javahelper 0.72.3 > Control: forcemerge 923748 924256 > Control: retitle -1 shebang line in jh_build "#!/use/bin/perl" > > On 2019-03-10 Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Source: openjpeg2 > > Versi

javatools_0.72.4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 17:50:49 + Source: javatools Architecture: source Version: 0.72.4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Andrej Shadura Closes: 923748 Changes: ja

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923753: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923754: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923755: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923756: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923751: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#924256: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923757: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923758: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:04:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923748: fixed in javatools 0.72.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #923748, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Processed: Re: Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #923748 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Bug #923751 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packa

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Control: reopen -1 Hello Andrej, bug 923748 is about a different issue and unrelated to your recent upload. We need to fix it too and I proposed a patch here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923756#30 Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is th

Processed: Bug #923756 in javatools marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #923756 [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Bug #923748 [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Bug #923751 [javah

Processing of javatools_0.72.5_source.changes

javatools_0.72.5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: javatools_0.72.5.dsc javatools_0.72.5.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 at 18:14, Markus Koschany wrote: > > Control: reopen -1 > > Hello Andrej, > > bug 923748 is about a different issue and unrelated to your recent upload. > We need to fix it too and I proposed a patch here: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=923756#30 Sorry f

javatools_0.72.5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:26:19 + Source: javatools Architecture: source Version: 0.72.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: Andrej Shadura Closes: 923756 Changes: ja

Bug#923748: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923756: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923758: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923751: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#924256: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923757: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923753: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923755: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#923754: marked as done (javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:35:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#923756: fixed in javatools 0.72.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #923756, regarding javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module to be marked as done. This mean

Processed: affects 924256

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 924256 + openjpeg2 Bug #924256 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error - The code being documented uses packages in the unnamed module Bug #923748 {Done: Andrej Shadura } [javahelper] javahelper: javadoc: error -

Bug#915291: java3ds-fileloader FTBFS: error: package com.sun.j3d.utils.applet does not exist

On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 04:36:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: java3ds-fileloader > Version: 1.2+dfsg-3 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs > > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/java3ds-fileloader.html > > ... > build: > [mkdir] Created dir: > /build/1s

Processed: Bug #924224 in uimaj marked as pending

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #924224 [uima-utils] uima-utils: broken symlink: /usr/share/uima/lib/uima-adapter-soap.jar -> ../../java/uimaj-adapter-soap.jar Added tag(s) pending. -- 924224: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=924224 Debian Bug Tracking System

Processing of openhft-chronicle-threads_1.1.6-2_source.changes

openhft-chronicle-threads_1.1.6-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: openhft-chronicle-threads_1.1.6-2.dsc openhft-chronicle-threads_1.1.6-2.debian.tar.xz openhft-chronicle-threads_1.1.6-2_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (run

Processing of uimaj_2.10.2-3_source.changes

uimaj_2.10.2-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: uimaj_2.10.2-3.dsc uimaj_2.10.2-3.debian.tar.xz uimaj_2.10.2-3_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's

openhft-chronicle-threads_1.1.6-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:51:46 -0700 Source: openhft-chronicle-threads Architecture: source Version: 1.1.6-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: tony mancill Closes: 9177

Bug#917738: marked as done (openhft-chronicle-threads: FTBFS: [ERROR] /<>/src/main/java/net/openhft/chronicle/threads/MonitorEventLoop.java:[123, 32] cannot find symbol)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:20:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#917738: fixed in openhft-chronicle-threads 1.1.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #917738, regarding openhft-chronicle-threads: FTBFS: [ERROR] /<>/src/main/java/net/openhft/chronicle/threads/MonitorEventLoop

uimaj_2.10.2-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:42:41 -0700 Source: uimaj Architecture: source Version: 2.10.2-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Changed-By: tony mancill Closes: 924224 Changes: uimaj

Bug#924224: marked as done (uima-utils: broken symlink: /usr/share/uima/lib/uima-adapter-soap.jar -> ../../java/uimaj-adapter-soap.jar)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Mar 2019 23:25:05 + with message-id and subject line Bug#924224: fixed in uimaj 2.10.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #924224, regarding uima-utils: broken symlink: /usr/share/uima/lib/uima-adapter-soap.jar -> ../../java/uimaj-adapter-soap.jar to be marked as do

multiverse-core: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

2019-03-10 13:16 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/multiverse-core changed from FTBFS -> reproducible __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debian-j...@lists.d

owasp-java-html-sanitizer is marked for autoremoval from testing

owasp-java-html-sanitizer 0.1+r88-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-04-01 It is affected by these RC bugs: 923654: libowasp-java-html-sanitizer-java-doc: Depends on libjsr305-java-doc which is no longer built in sid/buster __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

hikaricp 2.7.1-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the hikaricp source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.7.1-1 Current version: 2.7.1-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receiv

libjavaewah-java 0.7.9-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the libjavaewah-java source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.6.12-2 Current version: 0.7.9-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you wi

netbeans 10.0-3 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the netbeans source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 10.0-2 Current version: 10.0-3 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

openhft-lang 6.7.6-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the openhft-lang source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 6.7.6-1 Current version: 6.7.6-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re

openhft-chronicle-core 2.17.5-v1.1.8-2 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the openhft-chronicle-core source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.1.8-1 Current version: 2.17.5-v1.1.8-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times