Bug#1034824: tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm

Le 2023-05-13 22:38, Markus Koschany a écrit : The question is: If we ship libtomcat9-java in Bookworm and change the dependency from tomcat9-user to tomcat10-user, will a web application like dogtag-pki, which is designed for Tomcat 9, continue to work with Tomcat 10? I'm pretty sure it won

tiles: status change on tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian

Dear maintainer, The reproducibility status of the package tiles changed during the continuous testing. See the following notes for more details: 2023-05-13 20:46 https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/tiles changed from FTBFS -> reproducible Feel free to reply to this ema

Bug#1034824: tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm

Hi Salvatore, adding Timo Aaltonen, maintainer of dogtag-pki and tomcatjss, to CC Am Samstag, dem 13.05.2023 um 20:50 +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso: > Hi Markus, > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 06:27:49PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > > I have just pushed the necessary changes to our Git repo

Bug#1034824: tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm

Hi Markus, On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 06:27:49PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > I have just pushed the necessary changes to our Git repository. > > https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/tomcat9/-/commit/adbd0b0711de66b67278b10e258c47c805e9b993 Do we need to have done more here? When Paul asked on #d

Bug#1034824: tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm

I have just pushed the necessary changes to our Git repository. https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/tomcat9/-/commit/adbd0b0711de66b67278b10e258c47c805e9b993 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Processed: Bug#1034824 marked as pending in tomcat9

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #1034824 [src:tomcat9] tomcat9 should not be released with Bookworm Added tag(s) pending. -- 1034824: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034824 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems __ This is the

Bug#915504: marked as done (sbt: Fails to detect version of java)

Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 14:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035929: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #915504, regarding sbt: Fails to detect version of java to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#894540: marked as done (sbt FTBFS with openjdk-9)

Your message dated Sat, 13 May 2023 14:47:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1035929: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #894540, regarding sbt FTBFS with openjdk-9 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#1035929: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 0.13.13-2+rm Dear submitter, as the package sbt has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1035929 The ve

Bug#1035929: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: libsbt-java | 0.13.13-2 | all sbt | 0.13.13-2 | source, all --- Reason --- RoQA; no rdeps, outdated, no upload since 2017 -