Bug#1071806: powermock: FTBFS: core/src/main/java/org/powermock/core/ClassReplicaCreator.java:[99, 36] incompatible types: java.lang.Class cannot be converted to java.lang.Class

2024-05-24 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:powermock Version: 1.6.6-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build dh build

Bug#1071797: jodd: FTBFS: Could not resolve all files for configuration ':jodd-log:compileClasspath'.

2024-05-24 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:jodd Version: 3.8.6-1.1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build dh build

Bug#1071796: jajuk: FTBFS: src/main/java/org/jajuk/ui/helpers/PlaylistRepositoryTableModel.java:101: error: is not abstract and does not

2024-05-24 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:jajuk Version: 1:1.10.9+dfsg2-4 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs Dear maintainer: During a rebuild of all packages in unstable, your package failed to build: [...] debian/rules build dh build

Processed: bump severity for usr-merge bugs

2024-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 1057743 important Bug #1057743 [src:android-sdk-meta] android-sdk-meta: delegate placement of udev files to udev.pc Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > severity 1057752 important Bug #1057752 [src:fpga-icestorm] fpga-icestorm:

Processed: Re: Bug#1025012: zookeeper: starts but is completely unusable

2024-05-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 1025012 3.8.0-11+deb12u1 Bug #1025012 [zookeeper] zookeeper: starts but is completely unusable Marked as found in versions zookeeper/3.8.0-11+deb12u1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Bug#1025012: zookeeper: starts but is completely unusable

2024-05-24 Thread Filippo Giunchedi
found 3.8.0-11+deb12u1 thanks On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:33:07PM +0100, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: [...] > > Because of the last paragraph in the > > relevant section therein, I was unsure I should choose a SLF4J > > binding > > as this would impose my choice to the end user. What do you