Bug#1055348: jetty9: Update from DLA 3641 breaks puppetdb ("Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: KeyStores with multiple certificates are not supported on the base class org.ecl

2023-11-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 21:46 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am Sonntag, dem 05.11.2023 um 20:35 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > [...] > > After a bit of searching, I happened across a discussion of a > > similar > > change in a different product that mentioned the &

Bug#1055348: jetty9: Update from DLA 3641 breaks puppetdb ("Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: KeyStores with multiple certificates are not supported on the base class org.ecl

2023-11-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2023-11-05 at 19:18 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am Sonntag, dem 05.11.2023 um 16:33 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > > [...] > > Do you have an idea how simple rebuilding the bullseye package on > > buster would be? I'm happy to try that in general, but I&#x

Bug#1055348: jetty9: Update from DLA 3641 breaks puppetdb ("Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: KeyStores with multiple certificates are not supported on the base class org.ecl

2023-11-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 20:33 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Could you install the version of trapperkeeper-webserver-jetty9- > clojure from Bullseye and reinstall the jetty9 security update and > report back if this solves your problem? Doing that directly doesn't "just work": libtrapperkeeper-w

Bug#1055348: jetty9: Update from DLA 3641 breaks puppetdb ("Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalStateException: KeyStores with multiple certificates are not supported on the base class org.ecl

2023-11-04 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Source: jetty9 Version: 9.4.50-4+deb10u1 Severity: serious X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@debian.org Hi, Upgrading libjetty9-java and libjetty9-extra-java to the version from DLA 3641-1 reliably causes PuppetDB to fail to start, with the stacktrace shown below. Downgrading resolves the issue. I'm not sure w

Bug#875358: Powermock RC #875358

2019-03-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 23:34 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > I have removed powermock from all reverse-dependencies. This bug > should no longer be a blocker for Buster and powermock can be safely > removed from testing. You didn't, however, ask for unblocks for the reverse-dependencies. I've now