Source: rxtx
Version: 2.2.0+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.2.0+dfsg-3
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1070417
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Source: mac-widgets
Version: 0.10.0+svn416-dfsg1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies
Source: ca-certificates-java
Version: 20240118
Severity: important
Hi,
The migration of `apt` was blocked because of apparent regressions in
ca-certificates-java. The test can-install-jre tries to install all
available jre-headless packages, regardless of pinning, so it will try
to install
Source: libfreemarker-java
Version: 2.3.31-2
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 2.3.32-1
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1060940
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: lz4-java
Version: 1.8.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.8.0-4
Tags: sid trixie ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30
Source: ca-certificates-java
Version: 20230710
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: fails-always
Dear maintainer(s),
Your package has an autopkgtest, great. However, it fails in all suites
except when unstable is available. Can you please investigate the
situation and
Source: takari-polyglot-maven
Version: 0.4.11-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 0.4.11-2
Tags: sid trixie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more
Hi Jonathan,
On 18-08-2023 18:48, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
I'm therefore inclined to make a stable update sooner than the point
release. How does this text sound?
| ca-certificates-java, a package to update the cacerts JKS keystore used
| for many java runtimes, may fail to install alongside
Hi,
On 26-05-2023 21:34, Markus Koschany wrote:
Do I understand you correctly, that we only ship libtomcat9-java in Bookworm
now? Shall I upload a new revision of tomcat9 too?
Yes and yes.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
This is the maintainer address of
Hi,
On 26-05-2023 10:58, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Can't we just do the pragmatic fix of updating src:tomcat9 to only ship
libtomcat9-java and libtomcat9-embed-java? The maintenance burden for
security updates lies within the server stack, the percentage of issues
affecting the libtomcat9-java
Control: clone -1 -2 -3
Control: reassign -2 release-notes
Control: reassign -3 debian-security-support
Control: tag -1 bookworm-ignore
Hi,
On 26-05-2023 00:10, Markus Koschany wrote:
#1036250 is mainly a logback problem, not a tomcat problem. I still would like
to hear Emmanuel's opinion. We
Hi,
On 12-05-2023 21:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
I'll check on Sunday on the proposal, unless somebody beats me to it. I
don't have time before then.
This dropped off my radar and I don't expect I have decent time to look
at this until a week from now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description
Hi Markus,
Thanks for the reply and sorry for my bit grumpy mail yesterday. I was
tired and surprised.
On 11-05-2023 23:31, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...] (all good reply).
I'll check on Sunday on the proposal, unless somebody beats me to it. I
don't have time before then.
Paul
Hi Markus,
On Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:04:09 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
We can only support one major Tomcat version per release. Tomcat9 has
been part of Buster and Bullseye already and is superseded by Tomcat
10 in Bookworm. I wanted to wait with the removal request until the
issues in
Hi Markus,
Thanks for following-up. It further clarified pieces.
On 06-04-2023 15:14, Markus Koschany wrote:
I always rebuild all reverse-dependencies with ratt before I upload a Java
library package. From my Java experience I know this uncovers almost all
problems. Rhino is not some obscure
Hi,
On 06-04-2023 14:50, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5
Please find the debdiffs attached.
Go ahead
Thanks, I have rescheduled dojo to 0 days and it got accepted.
Paul
Control: tags -1 pending patch
On 06-04-2023 12:54, Paul Gevers wrote:
I'm going to prepare NMU's for rhino and dojo and upload to DELAYED/5
Please find the debdiffs attached.
Paul
diff -Nru rhino-1.7.14/debian/changelog rhino-1.7.14/debian/changelog
--- rhino-1.7.14/debian/changelog
Hi,
On Sun, 26 Mar 2023 16:26:00 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
1. There is no transition needed because only shrinksafe is affected by the new
rhino version.
I'm wondering how you know, did you test (without rebuilding) all the
reverse dependencies? If so, how did you do that? (I'm worried
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:42:17 + Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
* New upstream version 1.7.14.
- Fix FTBFS with OpenJDK 17. (Closes: #1026639)
Is it possible to get a targeted fix? This new upstream is not
reviewable and I seriously doubt it meets the freeze policy [1]
1325
Package: libtycho-java
Version: 1.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: fais to install
Dear maintainer,
You package depends on libeclipse-osgi-util-java but that no longer
exists in unstable.
Paul
__
This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team
Control: retitle -1 libapache-poi-java needs updates for newer xmlbeans
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:54:32 +0200 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien?= Villemot
wrote:
octave-io’s upstream
thinks that the problem comes from an incorrect combination of versions
between libapache-poi-java and xmlbeans. That
Hi,
On Thu, 26 May 2022 08:40:07 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libspring-java
Version: 4.3.30-1
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
This seems related to the new upstream version of xmlbeans earlier this
year. It seems to me that also
Source: bouncycastle, pgpainless
Control: found -1 bouncycastle/1.72-1
Control: found -1 pgpainless/1.3.13-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of bouncycastle the autopkgtest of pgpainless
Source: byte-buddy
Version: 1.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build dependencies shouldn't be
Source: libreflectasm-java
Version: 1.11.9+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Dear maintainer(s),
Dose [1] is reporting a build issue with your package, it's missing a
build dependency. Obviously your build
Hi,
On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 21:25:49 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
Your package failed to build from
source on arm64 and armhf while it built there successfully in the past.
I just checked to see if there would be a commit upstream to fix the
FTBFS, but it seems that upstream is active
Source: gradle
Version: 4.4.1-13
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4.4.1-14
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 1012214 1013545
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Source: openjfx
Version: 11.0.11+0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 11.0.11+1-1
Tags: sid bookworm
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 60
Source: openjdk-11-jre-dcevm
Version: 11.0.12+7-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 11.0.15+1-1
Tags: sid bookworm ftbfs
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and
Hi Sébastien,
On 07-06-2022 16:45, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
P.S.: Why was libapache-poi-java 4.0.1-4 allowed to migrate to testing?
Autopkgtest regressions are supposed to be blockers for testing
migration.
Because the octave-io test regressed in testing.
Source: libapache-poi-java, octave-io
Control: found -1 libapache-poi-java/4.0.1-4
Control: found -1 octave-io/2.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of libapache-poi-java the
Source: libidn
Version: 1.38-1
Severity: important
Control: affects -1 src:libjxmpp-java
Hi,
In a recent upload you dropped libidn11-java from the list of built
packages. However, that binary has one reverse dependency: libjxmpp-java.
Please align with the maintainers of that package (in
Hi Julien,
On Tue, 18 May 2021 21:38:46 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 08-04-2021 19:33, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > I've started to look at it, I'm afraid building up context on this
> > stuff to understand what it's doing is going to take a while...
>
> Just a friendly ping.
1)?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ivo
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:04:35AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:11:37 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
>>>> Is it possible that we get this uploaded soon? If you have the fix
>&g
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:28:07 +0100 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> tags 922981 + pending - moreinfo
> thanks
Is it possible that we get this uploaded soon? If you have the fix
ready, it would be good to have it sooner rather than later as we're in
the freeze, so it gets a bit of exposure.
control: reassign -1 openjdk-11-jre-headless 11.0.7+10-3~deb10u1
control: severity -1 serious
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 19:24:46 +0100 Chris Hofstaedtler
wrote:
> * Robert Nelson [210207 18:23]:
> > I fixed this locally in our BeagleBoard.org Debian Repo with this quick
> > patch:
>
> > -
Hi all,
On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:20:43 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I looked into this again and would suggest to demote the
> ca-certificates-java -> default-jre-headless
> dependency to a recommends.
> ca-certificates-java will have to gracefully handle the case that no JRE
> is available
Hi Emmanuel,
On 16-12-2020 16:47, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Paul
>
> Le 15/12/2020 à 20:49, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>
>> Unfortunately, there hasn't been any activity on this bug accept for bug
>> manipulation. rhino is a key package, so is not going to be autoremoved.
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:29:24 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> With a recent upload of rhino the autopkgtest of dojo fails in testing
> when that autopkgtest is run with the binary packages of rhino from
> unstable.
Unfortunately, there hasn't been any
Source: rhino
Version: 1.7.7.1-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.7.7.2-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Control: block -1 by 970501
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Emmanuel,
On 29-10-2020 10:12, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 26-09-2020 15:31, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> I will switch pdfsam to use libhibernator-validator4-java now but I can
>> only address this problem when libsejda-commons-java has been approve
Hi Emmanuel,
On 26-09-2020 15:31, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I will switch pdfsam to use libhibernator-validator4-java now but I can
> only address this problem when libsejda-commons-java has been approved
> by the ftp team. This may take a while.
This happened in the mean time and I think pdfsam
Hi Sebastiaan,
On 22-10-2020 09:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> Some more allow-uninst hints are likely needed for the other packages.
>
> Thanks for the additional allow-uninst hints, it finally let openjfx
> migrate to testing.
You're welcome. Thanks for pinging me.
Paul
signature.asc
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 06:30:51 +0200 Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
> > The binaries for the 32-bit architectures were removed in #962915 [1],
> > but only for version 4.13.0-1 in unstable.
>
> This was not sufficient to let it migrate to testing.
>
> The
Hi maintainers,
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 01:26:45 +0200 Markus Koschany wrote:
> Package: libhibernate-validator-java
> Version: 5.3.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> The update of libhibernate-validator-java to version 5.3.6. broke at
> least pdfsam (#942507) and libspring-java. The new version is
Source: rhino, dojo
Control: found -1 rhino/1.7.7.2-1
Control: found -1 dojo/1.15.3+dfsg1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bullseye
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainer(s),
With a recent upload of rhino the
Source: google-http-client-java
Version: 1.27.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 1.31.0-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between
Source: zip4j
Version: 2.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 2.2.8-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing and
Source: libhibernate-validator-java
Version: 4.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 5.3.6-1
Tags: sid bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync
Source: shimdandy
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Control: fixed -1 1.2.1-1
Tags: sid bullseye pending
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: out-of-sync
Dear maintainer(s),
As recently announced [1], the Release Team now considers packages that
are out-of-sync between testing
Source: libtritonus-java
Version: 20070428-14+b1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Justification: ftbfs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear maintainers,
Your package is part of the libfluidsynth2 transition, so I scheduled
binNMU's. However, your package FTBFS on all architectures.
Source: vdjtools
Version: 1.2.1+git20190311-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: regression
Dear maintainers,
Your new package has an autopkgtest (great). However, it fails.
I copied some of the output at the bottom of this report.
Currently
Source: java-common, starjava-votable
Control: found -1 java-common/0.70
Control: found -1 starjava-votable/2.0+2018.05.01-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: breaks needs-update
Dear maintainers,
With a recent upload of java-common the
Dear maintainers,
As recently announced¹ Debian is now running autopkgtests in testing to
check if migration of a new source package causes regressions. It does
this with the binary packages of the new version of a source package
from unstable.
With the upload of version 0.65 of java-common the
54 matches
Mail list logo
