Bug#1057531: openjfx: diff for NMU version 11.0.11+1-3.2

Control: tags 1057531 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for openjfx (versioned as 11.0.11+1-3.2). The diff is attached to this message. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru openjfx-11.0.11+1/debian/changelog openjfx-11.0.11+1/debian/changelog --- openjfx-11.0.11+1/debian

Bug#1068159: openjfx: FTBFS on arm{el, hf}: /usr/include/features-time64.h:26:5: error: #error "_TIME_BITS=64 is allowed only with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64"

Thread 2,5,main]) completed. Took 0.929 secs. FAILURE: Build failed with an exception. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Bug#941808: java-package: depends on transitional libgl1-mesa-glx

; and could be safely uninstalled except java-package > Depends on it. > > Please change the dependency to the depended-on packages. libgl1-mesa-glx got removed from unstable and java-package is holding it back from being removed from testing. Raising the severity accordingly.

Re: Bug#1024453: mediathek: fails to start with openjdk 17

Control: reassign -1 java-wrappers 0.3 Control: affects -1 mediathekview On 2022-11-19 19:18:14 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: mediathekview > Version: 13.2.1+ds-1 > Severity: grave > X-Debbugs-Cc: sramac...@debian.org > > Since the switch to openjre-17 as defa

Bug#1004638: openjfx: diff for NMU version 11.0.11+0-1.1

[Note that mails to nnn...@bug.debian.org does not reach the submitter.] On 2022-10-26 18:33:39 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 26/10/2022 à 01:27, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > > Dear maintainer, > > > > I've prepared an NMU for openjfx (versioned as 11.0.11

Bug#1013009: openjfx: diff for NMU version 11.0.11+0-1.1

. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -Nru openjfx-11.0.11+0/debian/changelog openjfx-11.0.11+0/debian/changelog --- openjfx-11.0.11+0/debian/changelog 2021-02-03 16:18:39.0 +0100 +++ openjfx-11.0.11+0/debian/changelog 2022-10-26 00:07:14.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +openjfx (11.0.11+0-1.1

Bug#1004638: Bug#1013009: Bug#1004638: openjfx: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

e using were already deprecated in ffmpeg 4.x. From the APIchanges document linked by Philipp, changes from 3.x up to 5.x are be relevant. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-m

Bug#1021894: openjfx: FTBFS on arm64 and armhf

ecuter.java:110) at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.execution.ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.executeActions(ExecuteActionsTaskExecuter.java:92) ... 29 more * Get more help at https://help.gradle.org BUILD FAILED in 20m 9s Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher __ This is the maintainer address of Deb

Re: Bug#1004638: openjfx: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

On 2022-10-16 14:02:12 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2022-10-16 11:42:40 +, Philipp Kern wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:23:39PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > openjfx FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0 (available in experimental): > > [...] > > &

Re: Bug#1004638: openjfx: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

On 2022-10-16 11:42:40 +, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:23:39PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > openjfx FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0 (available in experimental): > [...] > > It looks like even upstream openjfx (moved to [1]) is still not > source-compatib

Bug#1004638: openjfx: FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0

n/av/decoder.o] Error 1 Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team <https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers>. Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and questions.

Re: Bug#980423: 3.12.4 makes several packages FTBFS

Control: reassign -1 libphonenumber-dev 7.1.0-7 On 2021-01-20 23:04:15 +0100, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi, > > * Sebastian Ramacher [2021-01-20 22:20]: > > On 2021-01-19 00:05:36 +0100, László Böszörményi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:24 PM Laurent