Hi,
On 2022-03-02 17:24, Markus Koschany wrote:
(Speaking about tomcat10, I noted the package in experimental is really
old - doesn't seem to have been updated for a few years. Do you know if
anyone is working on updating the package to e.g. Tomcat 10.0.17 or will
it perhaps happen later in
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 16:43 +0200 schrieb Per Lundberg:
[...]
> (Speaking about tomcat10, I noted the package in experimental is really
> old - doesn't seem to have been updated for a few years. Do you know if
> anyone is working on updating the package to e.g. Tomcat 10.0.17 or
Hi Markus,
On 2022-03-02 14:15, Markus Koschany wrote:
As a matter of fact OpenJDK 11 is the only supported Java version in oldstable,
stable and testing right now. We plan to release with Java 17 next year and one
of our goals is to ship only Tomcat 10 in Debian 12 "Bookworm". I think you are
Hello Per,
Am Mittwoch, dem 02.03.2022 um 12:54 +0200 schrieb Per Lundberg:
> reassign 1006647 tomcat9
> thanks
>
> This might better belong to this package, since the problem is that
> tomcat9-common depends on default-jre-headless | java8-runtime-headless
> > java8-runtime, while in reality
reassign 1006647 tomcat9
thanks
This might better belong to this package, since the problem is that
tomcat9-common depends on default-jre-headless | java8-runtime-headless
| java8-runtime, while in reality it requires Java 11. (because of
Eclipse JDT 4.21, see original bug report for details)
Package: libeclipse-jdt-core-java
Version: 3.27.0+eclipse4.21-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The 3.27.0+eclipse4.21-1 version of the package has switched to using
the 4.21 version of the upstream package (libeclipse-jdt-core-java).
This is problematic for us and potentially others who are
