Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 11:36:46AM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 08:03:06AM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > I'm +1 for the change, but at this point I propose we wait for bookworm > > > to release. I'm not sure what could go wrong, but it seems late in the

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 08:03:06AM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm +1 for the change, but at this point I propose we wait for bookworm > > to release. I'm not sure what could go wrong, but it seems late in the > > release cycle for this change. How about an upload to experimental?

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Hi, > I'm +1 for the change, but at this point I propose we wait for bookworm > to release. I'm not sure what could go wrong, but it seems late in the > release cycle for this change. How about an upload to experimental? An upload to experimental would be great. Thanks, Alex __ This is the

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 08:55:14AM +0100, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > If I can help providing a build ready to upload for this, do not hesitate to > ping me. Hi Alex, I'm +1 for the change, but at this point I propose we wait for bookworm to release. I'm not sure what could go wrong, but it seems

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Hi, If I can help providing a build ready to upload for this, do not hesitate to ping me. Alex __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team . Please use debian-j...@lists.debian.org for discussions and

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Hello everyone, Le 29/03/2022 à 11:59, Markus Koschany a écrit : Am Montag, dem 28.03.2022 um 21:06 -0700 schrieb tony mancill: [...] I am interested to hear other opinions from the Debian Java Team. I have no objections with implementing this change and I agree that a versionless symlink is

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Am Montag, dem 28.03.2022 um 21:06 -0700 schrieb tony mancill: > [...] > I am interested to hear other opinions from the Debian Java Team. I have no objections with implementing this change and I agree that a versionless symlink is preferable for consistency reasons. The current behavior doesn't

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 07:17:46PM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On 2022-03-23 16:33, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > > Seems to work: > > > > $ ls -la /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner* > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 18 mars 18:20 > > /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner-2.26.jar ->

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Hi Alexandre, On 2022-03-23 16:33, Alexandre Rossi wrote: > Seems to work: > > $ ls -la /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 18 mars 18:20 > /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner-2.26.jar -> htmlcleaner.jar > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 176219 18 mars 18:20

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

Hi, > > I vaguely remember that replacing a symlink with a file during a package > > update was causing some issues (i.e. the target is updated but the symlink > > Wasn’t that only for directories? Seems to work: $ ls -la /usr/share/java/htmlcleaner* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 18 mars

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

On Wed, 23 Mar 2022, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I vaguely remember that replacing a symlink with a file during a package > update was causing some issues (i.e. the target is updated but the symlink Wasn’t that only for directories? bye, //mirabilos -- Infrastrukturexperte • tarent solutions GmbH

Bug#1007923: maven-*-helper JAR placement seems to contradict Java policy

I vaguely remember that replacing a symlink with a file during a package update was causing some issues (i.e. the target is updated but the symlink isn't replaced). If that's still true I'd refrain from applying this change to maven-debian-helper. The slight deviation from the Java policy