Bug#875358: Powermock RC #875358

2019-03-09 Thread Markus Koschany
Am 09.03.19 um 18:55 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 23:34 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >> I have removed powermock from all reverse-dependencies. This bug >> should no longer be a blocker for Buster and powermock can be safely >> removed from testing. > > You didn't, however,

Bug#875358: Powermock RC #875358

2019-03-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2019-03-01 at 23:34 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > I have removed powermock from all reverse-dependencies. This bug > should no longer be a blocker for Buster and powermock can be safely > removed from testing. You didn't, however, ask for unblocks for the reverse-dependencies. I've now

Bug#875358: Powermock RC #875358

2019-03-01 Thread Markus Koschany
I have removed powermock from all reverse-dependencies. This bug should no longer be a blocker for Buster and powermock can be safely removed from testing. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __ This is the maintainer address of Debian's Java team

Bug#875358: Powermock RC #875358

2019-02-21 Thread Markus Koschany
Hi, powermock has been failing to build from source since we introduced OpenJDK 9 to Debian. It has not been removed yet because several packages build-depend on it. reverse-depends -b libpowermock-java Reverse-Build-Depends-Indep === * jline2 Reverse-Build-Depends